» Articles » PMID: 10853803

The Role of Bone Scanning in Severe Frostbite of the Extremities: a Retrospective Study of 88 Cases

Overview
Journal Eur J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2000 Jun 15
PMID 10853803
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We performed a retrospective study of the results of two-phase technetium-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate bone scans in 88 patients with severe frostbite of the extremities. All patients were evaluated within 48 h after rewarming and all underwent a first bone scan (BS1) within 5 days after rewarming (median, day 2) (group 1). An excellent correlation was found between absence of tracer uptake in the phalanges and later amputation; this correlation was especially strong during the bone phase of the scans (specificity = 0.99, sensitivity = 0.96, positive predictive value = 0.92). Normal or high uptake in the phalanges was a reliable indicator of ultimate healing (negative predictive value = 0.99). The sensitivity of the examination was enhanced by performing a second scan (BS2) more than 5 days (median, day 8) after rewarming (group 2, n = 36). A comparative analysis of BS1 and BS2 demonstrated that some of the lesions continued to evolve between day 2 and day 8. This suggests that the lesions could still be modified during this period. On the basis of the findings it is recommended that bone scan be performed close to day 2 in all patients who present with lesions extending proximally to include the entirety of one or more phalanges. In the case of severe sepsis, the results of the first bone scan, BS1, can serve as an indication for emergency amputation. BS2 should be performed close to day 8 only if there is an area of low or absent uptake on BS1. It is concluded that scintigraphy is an excellent means of evaluating patients with severe frostbite of the extremities: as early as day 2 after the injury it can indicate whether amputation is necessary, and between days 2 and 8 it provides valuable information on the efficacy of treatment.

Citing Articles

The classification of freezing cold injuries - a NATO research task group position paper.

Norheim A, Sullivan-Kwantes W, Steinberg T, Castellani J, Friedl K Int J Circumpolar Health. 2023; 82(1):2203923.

PMID: 37083565 PMC: 10124983. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2023.2203923.


Bone scintigraphy outperformed anatomic images in frostbite injuries: a case report.

Ronchi B, Pena G, Carla A Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2022; 6(1):25.

PMID: 36352188 PMC: 9646677. DOI: 10.1186/s41824-022-00146-1.


Roxb. Expedites the Healing Process in Contact Frostbite.

Hassan W, Buabeid M, Kalsoom U, Bakht S, Akhtar I, Iqbal F Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:4327651.

PMID: 33083466 PMC: 7556107. DOI: 10.1155/2020/4327651.


The utility of bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT in the evaluation and management of frostbite injuries.

Manganaro M, Millet J, Brown R, Viglianti B, Wale D, Wong K Br J Radiol. 2018; 92(1094):20180545.

PMID: 30359097 PMC: 6404829. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180545.


The Use of tPA in the Treatment of Frostbite: A Systematic Review.

Hutchison R, Miller H, Michalke S Hand (N Y). 2018; 14(1):13-18.

PMID: 30227720 PMC: 6346356. DOI: 10.1177/1558944718800731.