» Articles » PMID: 10838650

A Clinical Decision Support System for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Effect on Physician Behavior

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2000 Jun 6
PMID 10838650
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Computer-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have been promoted for their potential to improve quality of health care. However, given the limited range of clinical settings in which they have been tested, such systems must be evaluated rigorously before widespread introduction into clinical practice.

Objective: To determine whether presentation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines using a CDSS increases the proportion of appropriate clinical practice decisions made.

Design: Time-series study conducted between December 1997 and July 1999.

Setting: Orthopedic surgery department of a teaching hospital in Paris, France.

Participants: A total of 1971 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery.

Intervention: A CDSS designed to provide immediate information pertaining to venous thromboembolism prevention among surgical patients was integrated into daily medical practice during three 10-week intervention periods, alternated with four 10-week control periods, with a 4-week washout between each period.

Main Outcome Measure: Proportion of appropriate prescriptions ordered for anticoagulation, according to preestablished clinical guidelines, during intervention vs control periods.

Results: Physicians complied with guidelines in 82.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.6%-87.1%) of cases during control periods and in 94.9% (95% CI, 92.5%-96.6%) of cases during intervention periods. During each intervention period, the appropriateness of prescription increased significantly (P<.001). Each time the CDSS was removed, physician practice reverted to that observed before initiation of the intervention. The relative risk of inappropriate practice decisions during control periods vs intervention periods was 3.8 (95% CI, 2.7-5.4).

Conclusions: In our study, implementation of clinical guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis through a CDSS used routinely in an orthopedic surgery department and integrated into the hospital information system changed physician behavior and improved compliance with guidelines. JAMA. 2000;283:2816-2821

Citing Articles

Impact of Clinical Decision Support with Mandatory versus Voluntary Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment in Hospitalized Patients.

Bahl V, Moote M, Hu H, Campbell Jr D TH Open. 2024; 8(3):e317-e328.

PMID: 39268041 PMC: 11392591. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1790519.


Proposal and Definition of an Intelligent Clinical Decision Support System Applied to the Prediction of Dyspnea after 12 Months of an Acute Episode of COVID-19.

Casal-Guisande M, Comesana-Campos A, Nunez-Fernandez M, Torres-Duran M, Fernandez-Villar A Biomedicines. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38672208 PMC: 11047904. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040854.


System-Wide Thromboprophylaxis Interventions for Hospitalized Patients at Risk of Venous Thromboembolism: Focus on Cross-Platform Clinical Decision Support.

Tsaftaridis N, Goldin M, Spyropoulos A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610898 PMC: 11013003. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072133.


Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities.

Chen Z, Liang N, Zhang H, Li H, Yang Y, Zong X Open Heart. 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 38016787 PMC: 10685930. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432.


Development and Integration of Machine Learning Algorithm to Identify Peripheral Arterial Disease: Multistakeholder Qualitative Study.

Wang S, Hogg H, Sangvai D, Patel M, Weissler E, Kellogg K JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e43963.

PMID: 37733427 PMC: 10557008. DOI: 10.2196/43963.