» Articles » PMID: 10831435

Role of Volatile Fatty Acids in Development of the Cecal Microflora in Broiler Chickens During Growth

Overview
Date 2000 Jun 1
PMID 10831435
Citations 109
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is known that volatile fatty acids can inhibit growth of species of the family Enterobacteriaceae in vitro. However, whether these volatile fatty acids affect bacterial populations in the ceca of chickens is unknown. Therefore, a study was conducted to investigate if changes in volatile fatty acids in ceca of broiler chickens during growth affect bacterial populations. Results showed that members of the Enterobacteriaceae and enterococci are present in large numbers in 3-day-old broilers and start to decrease when broilers grow older. Lactobacilli are present in large numbers as well in 3-day-old broilers, but they remain stable during the growth of broilers. Acetate, butyrate, and propionate increase from undetectable levels in 1-day-old broilers to high concentrations in 15-day-old broilers, after which they stabilize. Significant negative correlations could be calculated between numbers of Enterobacteriaceae and concentrations of undissociated acetate, propionate, and butyrate. Furthermore, pure cultures of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from the ceca were grown in the presence of volatile fatty acids. Growth rates and maximal optical density decreased when these strains grew in the presence of increasing volatile fatty acid concentrations. It is concluded that volatile fatty acids are responsible for the reduction in numbers of Enterobacteriaceae in the ceca of broiler chickens during growth.

Citing Articles

Research advancements on the diversity and host interaction of gut microbiota in chickens.

Yue Y, Luasiri P, Li J, Laosam P, Sangsawad P Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1492545.

PMID: 39628868 PMC: 11611998. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1492545.


Effect of feeding chitosan and blend of essential organic acids on growth performance, haematological parameters and innate immunity in early aged male layer chicks.

Chahar G, Deshmukh S, Banga H, Kaur P Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024; 56(7):251.

PMID: 39225828 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-024-04081-0.


Dihydromyricetin improves growth performance, immunity, and intestinal functions in weaned pigs challenged by enterotoxigenic .

Xie K, Qi J, Deng L, Yu B, Luo Y, Huang Z Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1421871.

PMID: 39193366 PMC: 11348495. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1421871.


Dietary jack bean ( L.) supplementation enhanced intestinal health by modulating intestinal integrity and immune responses of broiler chickens.

Madani A, Muhlisin M, Kurniawati A, Baskara A, Al Anas M Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34389.

PMID: 39130426 PMC: 11315099. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34389.


Effects of Adding Z392 to Drinking Water on Growth Performance, Intestinal Histological Structure, and Microbial Community of Broiler Chickens.

Wang M, Zhong J, Guo Y, Zhao S, Xia H, Wang G Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(13).

PMID: 38998032 PMC: 11240382. DOI: 10.3390/ani14131920.


References
1.
Pascual M, Hugas M, Badiola J, Monfort J, Garriga M . Lactobacillus salivarius CTC2197 prevents Salmonella enteritidis colonization in chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999; 65(11):4981-6. PMC: 91670. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.11.4981-4986.1999. View

2.
Ochi Y, Mitsuoka T, SEGA T . [The intestinal flora of the chicken. 3. Development of the intestinal flora from chick to hen]. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1964; 193(1):80-95. View

3.
Barnes E, Mead G, Barnum D, Harry E . The intestinal flora of the chicken in the period 2 to 6 weeks of age, with particular reference to the anaerobic bacteria. Br Poult Sci. 1972; 13(3):311-26. DOI: 10.1080/00071667208415953. View

4.
Freter R, Abrams G . Function of various intestinal bacteria in converting germfree mice to the normal state. Infect Immun. 1972; 6(2):119-26. PMC: 422503. DOI: 10.1128/iai.6.2.119-126.1972. View

5.
Lee A, Gemmell E . Changes in the mouse intestinal microflora during weaning: role of volatile fatty acids. Infect Immun. 1972; 5(1):1-7. PMC: 422310. DOI: 10.1128/iai.5.1.1-7.1972. View