» Articles » PMID: 10828669

Long-term Outcome of Transrectal High- Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Overview
Journal Eur Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2000 Jun 1
PMID 10828669
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcome after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods: Between June 1992 and March 1995, 98 men (mean age: 66 years) with LUTS due to BPH underwent transrectal HIFU therapy at our institution, and the data of 80 patients were included in this long-term analysis. Principal inclusion criteria were a peak flow rate (Qmax) < or =15 ml/s, AUA/IPSS score > or =18 and a prostate volume < or =75 ml. Postoperatively, patients were seen at 6-month intervals with assessment of symptom score, uroflowmetry and post-void residual volume. In the present analysis, follow-up was terminated at 4 years. The mean follow-up of the study population (excluding the patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate, TURP, due to insufficient therapeutic response) was 41.3 months (range: 13-48 months).

Results: In treatment responders (HIFU only; n = 45), the symptom score decreased from preoperatively 19.6 to 8.5 (-53%) after 12 months and subsequently showed only marginal fluctuations within the 4-year study period. The Qmax increased from preoperatively 9.1 to 11.8 ml/s (+30%) after 12 months and gradually declined to 10.2 ml/s (+12%) after 4 years. 35 men (43.8%) underwent TURP due to insufficient therapeutic response during the 4-year study period. The mean time interval between HIFU therapy and TURP was 26.5+/-2.7 months (range: 1-48 months). The retreatment-free period was significantly longer for patients with a pretreatment average flow rate >5 ml/s (p = 0.05) and lower grades of urodynamically documented bladder outflow obstruction (p = 0.03). A similar trend, which did not reach statistical significance, was noted for individuals with higher Qmax and lower post-void residuals.

Conclusions: These long-time data indicate that transrectal HIFU therapy for BPH, at least in its present form, did not stand the test of time, as 43.8% of patients had to undergo TURP within 4 years after initial therapy. These data underline the need for long-term studies with follow-ups over several years to reliably assess the role of less invasive treatment options for BPH.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of High-Intensity, Focused Ultrasound for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment: A Forgotten Option?.

Garcia-Becerra C, Soltero-Molinar V, Arias-Gallardo M, Juarez-Garcia J, Garcia N, Fernandez-Avila L Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65384.

PMID: 39184607 PMC: 11344649. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65384.


Minimally invasive techniques in quest of Holy Grail of surgical management of enlarged prostates: a narrative review.

Porto J, Titus R, Camargo F, Bhatia A, Ahie N, Blachman-Braun R World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):35.

PMID: 38217727 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04747-8.


Minimally Invasive Treatment in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).

Sciacqua L, Vanzulli A, Di Meo R, Pellegrino G, Lavorato R, Vitale G Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023; 22:15330338231155000.

PMID: 36794408 PMC: 9936536. DOI: 10.1177/15330338231155000.


Control of inflammation using non-invasive neuromodulation: past, present and promise.

Tynan A, Brines M, Chavan S Int Immunol. 2021; 34(2):119-128.

PMID: 34558623 PMC: 8783606. DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxab073.


An Introduction to High Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Systematic Review on Principles, Devices, and Clinical Applications.

Izadifar Z, Izadifar Z, Chapman D, Babyn P J Clin Med. 2020; 9(2).

PMID: 32046072 PMC: 7073974. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020460.