Sorbitol and Myo-inositol Levels and Morphology of Sural Nerve in Relation to Peripheral Nerve Function and Clinical Neuropathy in Men with Diabetic, Impaired, and Normal Glucose Tolerance
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aims: Sorbitol and myo-inositol levels and morphology of sural nerve were compared with nerve function and clinical neuropathy in men with diabetic, impaired (IGT), and normal glucose tolerance.
Methods: After neurography of sural nerve and determinations of sensory thresholds for vibration, warm and cold on the foot, whole nerve sural nerve biopsy was performed in 10 men with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, 10 with IGT, and 10 with normal glucose tolerance. Polyol levels were assessed by gas-liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.
Results: Sural nerve amplitudes were significantly lower and sorbitol levels significantly higher in diabetic patients (median (interquartile range)) (3.7 (3.5) microV and 643 (412) pmol/mg protein, respectively) both compared with IGT (11.3 (10.6)microV; P = 0.04 and 286 (83) pmol/mg protein; P = 0.0032, respectively) and normally glucose tolerant (10.0 (11.6); P = 0.0142 and 296 (250) pmol/mg protein; P = 0.0191, respectively) subjects. There were no differences in nerve morphology between the three groups. Nerve myo-inositol levels correlated, however, positively with cluster density (rs = 0.56; P = 0.0054). In diabetic and IGT subjects, sural nerve amplitudes (2.6 (3.8) vs. 12.1 (10.6) microV; P = 0.0246) and myelinated nerve fibre density (MNFD; 4,076 (1091) vs. 5,219 (668) nerve fibres/mm2; P = 0.0021) were significantly lower in nine subjects with clinical neuropathy than in 10 without.
Conclusions: Nerve degeneration (i.e. MNFD) correlated with clinical neuropathy but not with glucose tolerance status whereas nerve myo-inositol levels positively correlated with signs of nerve regeneration (i.e. increased cluster density).
Dose-efficient multimodal microscopy of human tissue at a hard X-ray nanoprobe beamline.
Sala S, Zhang Y, De La Rosa N, Dreier T, Kahnt M, Langer M J Synchrotron Radiat. 2022; 29(Pt 3):807-815.
PMID: 35511013 PMC: 9070709. DOI: 10.1107/S1600577522001874.
Farias V, Uchoa P, Aquino C, Britto L, Fonteles M, Leal-Cardoso J Braz J Med Biol Res. 2019; 52(6):e8589.
PMID: 31166385 PMC: 6556969. DOI: 10.1590/1414-431x20198589.
Hao G, Zhang T, Zhang Q, Gu M, Chen C, Zou L Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24:4832-4840.
PMID: 30001299 PMC: 6069416. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.908379.
Omi M, Hata M, Nakamura N, Miyabe M, Ozawa S, Nukada H Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017; 8(1):279.
PMID: 29237486 PMC: 5729514. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-017-0729-5.
Mohseni S, Badii M, Kylhammar A, Thomsen N, Eriksson K, Malik R Brain Behav. 2017; 7(8):e00763.
PMID: 28828222 PMC: 5561322. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.763.