» Articles » PMID: 10809694

Lon Incompatibility Associated with Mutations Causing SOS Induction: Null UvrD Alleles Induce an SOS Response in Escherichia Coli

Overview
Journal J Bacteriol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2000 May 16
PMID 10809694
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The uvrD gene in Escherichia coli encodes a 720-amino-acid 3'-5' DNA helicase which, although nonessential for viability, is required for methyl-directed mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair and furthermore is believed to participate in recombination and DNA replication. We have shown in this study that null mutations in uvrD are incompatible with lon, the incompatibility being a consequence of the chronic induction of SOS in uvrD strains and the resultant accumulation of the cell septation inhibitor SulA (which is a normal target for degradation by Lon protease). uvrD-lon incompatibility was suppressed by sulA, lexA3(Ind(-)), or recA (Def) mutations. Other mutations, such as priA, dam, polA, and dnaQ (mutD) mutations, which lead to persistent SOS induction, were also lon incompatible. SOS induction was not observed in uvrC and mutH (or mutS) mutants defective, respectively, in excision repair and mismatch repair. Nor was uvrD-mediated SOS induction abolished by mutations in genes that affect mismatch repair (mutH), excision repair (uvrC), or recombination (recB and recF). These data suggest that SOS induction in uvrD mutants is not a consequence of defects in these three pathways. We propose that the UvrD helicase participates in DNA replication to unwind secondary structures on the lagging strand immediately behind the progressing replication fork, and that it is the absence of this function which contributes to SOS induction in uvrD strains.

Citing Articles

Differential impacts of DNA repair machinery on fluoroquinolone persisters with different chromosome abundances.

Tang J, Herzfeld A, Leon G, Brynildsen M mBio. 2024; 15(5):e0037424.

PMID: 38564687 PMC: 11077951. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00374-24.


Proteomic survey of the DNA damage response in .

Tashjian T, Zeinert R, Eyles S, Chien P J Bacteriol. 2023; 205(10):e0020623.

PMID: 37730540 PMC: 10601758. DOI: 10.1128/jb.00206-23.


Proteomic survey of the DNA damage response in .

Tashjian T, Zeinert R, Eyles S, Chien P bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 36993274 PMC: 10055390. DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.24.534141.


Molecular mechanisms of collateral sensitivity to the antibiotic nitrofurantoin.

Roemhild R, Linkevicius M, Andersson D PLoS Biol. 2020; 18(1):e3000612.

PMID: 31986134 PMC: 7004380. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000612.


A new role for Escherichia coli Dam DNA methylase in prevention of aberrant chromosomal replication.

Raghunathan N, Goswami S, Leela J, Pandiyan A, Gowrishankar J Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(11):5698-5711.

PMID: 30957852 PMC: 6582345. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz242.


References
1.
George J, Brosh Jr R, Matson S . A dominant negative allele of the Escherichia coli uvrD gene encoding DNA helicase II. A biochemical and genetic characterization. J Mol Biol. 1994; 235(2):424-35. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1003. View

2.
Rayssiguier C, Thaler D, Radman M . The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989; 342(6248):396-401. DOI: 10.1038/342396a0. View

3.
Matson S, Bean D, George J . DNA helicases: enzymes with essential roles in all aspects of DNA metabolism. Bioessays. 1994; 16(1):13-22. DOI: 10.1002/bies.950160103. View

4.
Kowalczykowski S, Dixon D, Eggleston A, Lauder S, Rehrauer W . Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev. 1994; 58(3):401-65. PMC: 372975. DOI: 10.1128/mr.58.3.401-465.1994. View

5.
Sancar A . Mechanisms of DNA excision repair. Science. 1994; 266(5193):1954-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.7801120. View