» Articles » PMID: 1080270

Acetylcholine Receptor: Modification of Synaptic Gating Mechanism After Treatment with a Disulfide Bond Reducing Agent

Overview
Journal Pflugers Arch
Specialty Physiology
Date 1975 Mar 22
PMID 1080270
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reduction of a 'reactive' disulfide bond in the postsyraptic membrane of the frog neuromuscular junction by dithiothreitol (DTT) decreases both the sensitivity of the membrane to applied acetylcholine (ACh) and the amplitude of the single 'shot effect'. Analysis of ACh induced conductance fluctuations in voltage clamped frog endplates indicates that DTT reduces both the amplitude gamma and duration tau of the elementary conductance events. The mean control value of gamma was 18.5-10(-12) omega-1 with no significant dependence on temperature. The mean control values pi were 2.3 msec at 7-9 degrees C and 0.94 msec at 20-22 degrees C. At 7-9 degrees C 1m7 DTT (20-50 min after application) reduced gamma to 61% of the control value and at 20-22 degrees C to 39%, while tau was reduced to 70% at both temperature ranges. The dose-response curve for iontophoretically applied ACh indicates that neither the total number of ionic channels nor the cooperativity within the receptors are changed. However, the affinity of ACh for the receptor sites was reduced. All effects of DTT were fully reversed by the oxidizing agent 5,5'-dithie-bis-(2-nitro-benzoic acid) (DTNB).

Citing Articles

Changes in neuromuscular junction endplate current time constants produced by sulfhydryl reagents.

Steinacker A, Zuazaga D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981; 78(12):7806-9.

PMID: 6278490 PMC: 349360. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7806.


A covalently bound photoisomerizable agonist: comparison with reversibly bound agonists at Electrophorus electroplaques.

Lester H, Krouse M, Nass M, Wassermann N, Erlanger B J Gen Physiol. 1980; 75(2):207-32.

PMID: 6246192 PMC: 2215740. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.75.2.207.


Substance P reduces acetylcholine-induced currents in isolated bovine chromaffin cells.

Clapham D, Neher E J Physiol. 1984; 347:255-77.

PMID: 6200595 PMC: 1199446. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015065.


Dose-response of acetylcholine receptor channels opened by a flash-activated agonist in voltage-clamped rat myoballs.

Chabala L, Gurney A, Lester H J Physiol. 1986; 371:407-33.

PMID: 2422352 PMC: 1192732. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015983.


Changes in channel properties of acetylcholine receptors during the time course of thiol chemical modifications.

Bouzat C, Barrantes F, Sigworth F Pflugers Arch. 1991; 418(1-2):51-61.

PMID: 2041725 DOI: 10.1007/BF00370451.


References
1.
Landau E, Silman I . The role of a reactive disulphide bond in the function of the acetylcholine receptor at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973; 234(2):305-25. PMC: 1350630. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010347. View

2.
Dreyer F, Peper K . The acetylcholine sensitivity in the vicinity of the neuromuscular junction of the frog. Pflugers Arch. 1974; 348(4):273-86. DOI: 10.1007/BF00589217. View

3.
Anderson C, Stevens C . Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973; 235(3):655-91. PMC: 1350786. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. View

4.
Bradley P, Candy J . Iontophoretic release of acetylcholine, noradrenaline, 5-hydroxytryptamine and D-lysergic acid diethylamide from micropipettes. Br J Pharmacol. 1970; 40(2):194-201. PMC: 1702896. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1970.tb09913.x. View

5.
Katz B, Miledi R . Membrane noise produced by acetylcholine. Nature. 1970; 226(5249):962-3. DOI: 10.1038/226962a0. View