» Articles » PMID: 10796809

Palliative Chemotherapy for Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Colorectal Meta-analysis Collaboration

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2000 May 5
PMID 10796809
Citations 23
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing use of palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer, there remains uncertainty as to the true effectiveness of this intervention. This review was therefore undertaken to assess the available evidence for the benefit of palliative chemotherapy in this disease.

Objectives: To determine the benefits and harms of palliative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. A secondary objective was to investigate outcomes for younger and elderly patients.

Search Strategy: Trials were identified by computerised and hand searches of the literature, scanning references and contacting investigators.

Selection Criteria: All randomised controlled trials of palliative chemotherapy compared with supportive care alone in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Both randomised and non-randomised studies were considered when searching for data on quality of life, resource use and cost effectiveness of palliative chemotherapy.

Data Collection And Analysis: Investigators from all eligible studies were asked to supply individual patient data. Meta-analysis was performed using both published data and individual patient data. Studies were grouped according to whether chemotherapy was administered regionally or systemically.

Main Results: 13 randomised controlled trials representing a total of 1365 randomised patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of a subset of trials that provided individual patient data demonstrated that palliative chemotherapy was associated with a 35% (95% CI 24% to 44%) reduction in the risk of death. This translates into an absolute improvement in survival of 16% at both 6 months and 12 months and an improvement in median survival of 3.7 months. The overall quality of evidence relating to treatment toxicity, symptom control and quality of life was poor.

Reviewer's Conclusions: Chemotherapy is effective in prolonging time to disease progression and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The survival benefit may be underestimated by this meta-analysis, as a proportion of patients in the control arms of some trials received chemotherapy. No age related differences were found in the effectiveness of chemotherapy, but elderly patients were under represented in trials. Treatment toxicity and impact upon quality of life and symptom control have been inadequately assessed in the majority of trials and further research is needed to clarify the palliative benefit of chemotherapy.

Citing Articles

Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy applications in upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer, a review.

Drittone D, Schipilliti F, Arrivi G, Mazzuca F Oncol Rev. 2024; 18:1496141.

PMID: 39659741 PMC: 11628282. DOI: 10.3389/or.2024.1496141.


Nutritional Status Is Associated With Physical Improvement of Palliative Cancer Patients During Cancer Rehabilitation.

Imajima T, Shirakawa T, Ohtsu Y, Uchihashi H, Otsuka T, Akashi K Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024; 4(4):503-509.

PMID: 38962538 PMC: 11215448. DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10355.


Correlation between overall survival and quality of life in colon cancer patients with chemotherapy.

Murakawa Y, Ootsuka K, Kusaka J, Miura K BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):492.

PMID: 37259045 PMC: 10230773. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10989-x.


The survival impact of palliative chemotherapy dose modifications on metastatic colon cancer.

Zainal Abidin M, Omar M, Islahudin F, Mohamed Shah N BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):731.

PMID: 35787795 PMC: 9254497. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09831-7.


Comparison of aggregate and individual participant data approaches to meta-analysis of randomised trials: An observational study.

Tierney J, Fisher D, Burdett S, Stewart L, Parmar M PLoS Med. 2020; 17(1):e1003019.

PMID: 32004320 PMC: 6993967. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003019.


References
1.
Kerr D, OConnor K . The costs of managing advanced colorectal cancer: a broad perspective. Anticancer Drugs. 1997; 8 Suppl 2:S23-6. DOI: 10.1097/00001813-199708002-00005. View

2.
Scheithauer W, Rosen H, Kornek G, Sebesta C, Depisch D . Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMJ. 1993; 306(6880):752-5. PMC: 1677246. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.306.6880.752. View

3.
Smyth J, Hardcastle J, Denton G, Alderson D, Grace R, Mansi J . Two phase III trials of tauromustine (TCNU) in advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 1995; 6(9):948-9. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059365. View

4.
Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James R, Punt C, Hickish T, Heikkila R . Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1998; 352(9138):1413-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02309-5. View

5.
Gerard K . Cost-utility in practice: a policy maker's guide to the state of the art. Health Policy. 1992; 21(3):249-79. DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(92)90022-4. View