» Articles » PMID: 10791609

Somatovisceral Interactions in Visceral Perception: Abdominal Masking of Colonic Stimuli

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2000 May 3
PMID 10791609
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinical and experimental evidence on referred pain and spinal-afferent convergence demonstrates a close relationship between visceral and somatosensory perception, which is important for current models of symptom perception and central body representation. The study uses a psychophysical approach to quantify these interactions at the perceptual level, taking into account problems of comparable intermodal scaling and the role of awareness. An experiment on somatosensory masking of distension stimuli in the colon is reported in which a multiple staircase method of forced choice discrimination with concurrent sensation ratings was employed. Results showed perceptual masking of visceral by abdominal stimuli but not vice versa. The masking effect was not enhanced by intratomal placement of the abdominal stimulus in the lower left quadrant. This contradicts the spinal sensory convergence model and points to perceptual interactions at higher brain levels. Loglinear analysis of relations between discrimination and subjective sensation revealed qualitative differences of somatovisceral perception at the preconscious as compared to the conscious level. This argues for a two-process model of integrative body perception.

Citing Articles

Can Interoception Improve the Pragmatic Search for Biomarkers in Psychiatry?.

Khalsa S, Lapidus R Front Psychiatry. 2016; 7:121.

PMID: 27504098 PMC: 4958623. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00121.

References
1.
Holzl R, Erasmus L, Moltner A . Detection, discrimination and sensation of visceral stimuli. Biol Psychol. 1996; 42(1-2):199-214. DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05155-4. View

2.
Erasmus L, Pull P, Kratzmair M, Holzl R . Method and apparatus for pressure-controlled distension of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Med Eng Phys. 1994; 16(4):338-47. DOI: 10.1016/1350-4533(94)90062-0. View

3.
Gracely R, Lota L, Walter D, Dubner R . A multiple random staircase method of psychophysical pain assessment. Pain. 1988; 32(1):55-63. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90023-1. View

4.
Jennings J . Is it important that the mind is in a body? Inhibition and the heart. Psychophysiology. 1992; 29(4):369-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb01710.x. View

5.
Koch G, Landis J, Freeman J, Freeman Jr D, Lehnen R . A general methodology for the analysis of experiments with repeated measurement of categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1):133-58. View