» Articles » PMID: 10790165

Response Characteristics and Receptive Field Widths of On-bipolar Cells in the Mouse Retina

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 2000 May 2
PMID 10790165
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Voltage-clamp and current-clamp recordings were made from bipolar cells in dark-adapted mouse retinal slices. Light-evoked responses fell into three groups corresponding to the rod bipolar cells, on-cone bipolar cells and off-cone bipolar cells. The morphology of the recorded cells confirmed this classification. Intensity-response relations were well fitted by a Michaelis saturation function with Hill coefficients of 1.15 +/- 0.11 (n = 6) for rod bipolar cells and 2.33 +/- 0.06 (n = 4) for cone inputs onto on-cone bipolar cells. In the absence of antagonists for GABA or glycine receptors, light-evoked synaptic currents for all cells displayed linear current-voltage relations that reversed near 0 mV, indicating that very little inhibition was activated under dark-adapted recording conditions. Saturating light stimuli evoked conductances of 0.81 +/- 0.56 nS (n = 4) in rod bipolar cells and 1.1 +/- 0.8 nS (n = 4) in on-cone bipolar cells. Receptive field widths were estimated by flashing a vertical light bar at various locations along the slice. Rod and on-cone bipolar cells had receptive field widths of 67 +/- 16 micrometer (n = 6) and 43 +/- 7 microm (n = 5), respectively. The maximum spatial resolution of an array of such cone bipolar cells was estimated to be 0.3 cycles deg-1, compared with a maximum resolution of 0.5 cycles deg-1 obtained from behavioural studies in mice. Our results suggest that this limit to spatial resolution could be imposed early in the visual system by the size of the bipolar cell receptive fields.

Citing Articles

Dendritic mGluR2 and perisomatic Kv3 signaling regulate dendritic computation of mouse starburst amacrine cells.

Acaron Ledesma H, Ding J, Oosterboer S, Huang X, Chen Q, Wang S Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1819.

PMID: 38418467 PMC: 10901804. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46234-7.


A Computational Model Simulates Light-Evoked Responses in the Retinal Cone Pathway.

Iseri E, Kosta P, Paknahad J, Bouteiller J, Lazzi G Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021; 2021:4482-4486.

PMID: 34892214 PMC: 10578446. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630642.


Nonlinear spatial integration in retinal bipolar cells shapes the encoding of artificial and natural stimuli.

Schreyer H, Gollisch T Neuron. 2021; 109(10):1692-1706.e8.

PMID: 33798407 PMC: 8153253. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.03.015.


Nonlinear Spatial Integration Underlies the Diversity of Retinal Ganglion Cell Responses to Natural Images.

Karamanlis D, Gollisch T J Neurosci. 2021; 41(15):3479-3498.

PMID: 33664129 PMC: 8051676. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3075-20.2021.


Electrical Imaging of Light-Induced Signals Across and Within Retinal Layers.

Lee M, Zeck G Front Neurosci. 2020; 14:563964.

PMID: 33328846 PMC: 7717958. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.563964.


References
1.
Euler T, Wassle H . Different contributions of GABAA and GABAC receptors to rod and cone bipolar cells in a rat retinal slice preparation. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 79(3):1384-95. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.3.1384. View

2.
DeVries S, Schwartz E . Kainate receptors mediate synaptic transmission between cones and 'Off' bipolar cells in a mammalian retina. Nature. 1999; 397(6715):157-60. DOI: 10.1038/16462. View

3.
Sasaki T, Kaneko A . L-Glutamate-induced responses in OFF-type bipolar cells of the cat retina. Vision Res. 1996; 36(6):787-95. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00176-x. View

4.
Kaneko A . Receptive field organization of bipolar and amacrine cells in the goldfish retina. J Physiol. 1973; 235(1):133-53. PMC: 1350736. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010381. View

5.
Ashmore J, Copenhagen D . An analysis of transmission from cones to hyperpolarizing bipolar cells in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1983; 340:569-97. PMC: 1199228. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014781. View