Jin Z, Yang G, Wen T, Miao B, Wang C, Zhang Q
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):20.
PMID: 39915817
PMC: 11800567.
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01354-7.
Zhang W, Wu S, Ren B, Jia R, Zhang W, Wang B
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1458527.
PMID: 39882266
PMC: 11774695.
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1458527.
Awwad J, Peramo B, Elgeyoushi B, Melado L, Salame A, Chawla M
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1506332.
PMID: 39726844
PMC: 11669953.
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1506332.
Wegrzynowicz A, Eyvazzadeh A, Beckley A
Semin Reprod Med. 2024; 42(2):100-111.
PMID: 39303740
PMC: 11837971.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791190.
Tehraninejad E, Alizadeh S, Nekoo E, Zargarzadeh N, Shariat M, Haghollahi F
BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):481.
PMID: 39223536
PMC: 11367876.
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03337-z.
Comparison of luteal support protocols in fresh IVF/ICSI cycles: a network meta-analysis.
Kastora S, Gkova G, Stavridis K, Balachandren N, Kastoras A, Karakatsanis A
Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14492.
PMID: 38914570
PMC: 11196689.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64804-z.
Enhanced Oral Bioavailability of Progesterone in Bilosome Formulation: Fabrication, Statistical Optimization, and Pharmacokinetic Study.
Maheshwari R, Bhatt L, Wairkar S
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024; 25(2):29.
PMID: 38302633
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-024-02747-4.
The efficacy and safety of luteal phase support with progesterone following ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Casarramona G, Lalmahomed T, Lemmen C, Eijkemans M, Broekmans F, Cantineau A
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:960393.
PMID: 36120470
PMC: 9481250.
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.960393.
Luteal Phase Support in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Vaginal Versus Intramuscular Progesterone Administration.
Azargoon A, Joorabloo G, Mirmohammadkhani M
J Reprod Infertil. 2022; 23(1):33-38.
PMID: 36045877
PMC: 9361730.
DOI: 10.18502/jri.v23i1.8450.
Treatment outcomes of blastocysts thaw cycles, comparing the presence and absence of a corpus luteum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gan J, Rozen G, Polyakov A
BMJ Open. 2022; 12(4):e051489.
PMID: 35473741
PMC: 9045106.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051489.
The inadequate corpus luteum.
Duncan W
Reprod Fertil. 2022; 2(1):C1-C7.
PMID: 35128435
PMC: 8812462.
DOI: 10.1530/RAF-20-0044.
A Comparative, Randomized Control Trial in Patients of Per Vaginal Bleeding Comparing Efficacy of Oral Dydrogesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone in Successful Pregnancy Outcome for Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.
Kale A, Kale A, Yelikar K
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021; 71(6):591-595.
PMID: 34898896
PMC: 8617090.
DOI: 10.1007/s13224-021-01473-2.
Luteal-phase support in assisted reproductive technology: An ongoing challenge.
Dashti S, Eftekhar M
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2021; 19(9):761-772.
PMID: 34723055
PMC: 8548747.
DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v19i9.9708.
Strengthened luteal phase support for patients with low serum progesterone on the day of frozen embryo transfer in artificial endometrial preparation cycles: a large-sample retrospective trial.
Gao H, Ye J, Ye H, Hong Q, Sun L, Chen Q
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021; 19(1):60.
PMID: 33892741
PMC: 8063468.
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00747-8.
Effect of Oral versus Vaginal Administration of Estradiol and Dydrogesterone on the Proliferative and Secretory Transformation of Endometrium in Patients with Premature Ovarian Failure and Preparing for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Feng W, Nie L, Wang X, Yang F, Pan P, Deng X
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021; 15:1521-1529.
PMID: 33883876
PMC: 8053706.
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S297236.
Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles.
Salehpour S, Saharkhiz N, Nazari L, Sobhaneian A, Hosseini S
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021; 25(2):242-245.
PMID: 33576204
PMC: 8083861.
DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200090.
Enhanced drug delivery to the reproductive tract using nanomedicine reveals therapeutic options for prevention of preterm birth.
Zierden H, Ortiz J, DeLong K, Yu J, Li G, Dimitrion P
Sci Transl Med. 2021; 13(576).
PMID: 33441428
PMC: 8713427.
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc6245.
Dydrogesterone as an oral alternative to vaginal progesterone for IVF luteal phase support: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
Griesinger G, Blockeel C, Kahler E, Pexman-Fieth C, Olofsson J, Driessen S
PLoS One. 2020; 15(11):e0241044.
PMID: 33147288
PMC: 7641447.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241044.
Relationship between serum progesterone (P) levels and pregnancy outcome: lessons from artificial cycles when using vaginal natural micronized progesterone.
Labarta E
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020; 37(8):2047-2048.
PMID: 32578031
PMC: 7468031.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01862-y.
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of progesterone vaginal pessaries versus progesterone vaginal gel for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial.
Saunders H, Khan C, DHooghe T, Magnusdottir T, Klingmann I, Hrafnsdottir S
Hum Reprod. 2020; 35(2):355-363.
PMID: 32074281
PMC: 7048710.
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez261.