» Articles » PMID: 10759093

Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Systemic Hypoperfusion Without Hypotension: Report of the SHOCK Trial Registry

Overview
Journal Am J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2000 Apr 12
PMID 10759093
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cardiogenic shock is usually characterized by inadequate cardiac output and sustained hypotension. However, following a large myocardial infarction, peripheral hypoperfusion can occur with relatively well maintained systolic blood pressure, a condition known as nonhypotensive cardiogenic shock. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of patients with this condition.

Methods: The SHOCK trial registry prospectively enrolled patients with suspected cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. We identified a group of 49 patients who presented with nonhypotensive shock, defined as clinical evidence of peripheral hypoperfusion with a systolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg without vasopressor circulatory support. Clinical characteristics, hemodynamic data, and outcomes in these patients were compared with a group of 943 patients with classic cardiogenic shock with hypotension. The age, gender, and distributions of coronary risk factors were similar in both groups.

Results: Patients with nonhypotensive shock were more likely to have an anterior wall myocardial infarction (71% versus 53%, P = 0.03). Both groups of patients had similar rates of treatment with thrombolytic therapy, angioplasty, and bypass surgery. Patients with nonhypotensive shock had an in-hospital mortality rate of 43% as compared with a rate of 66% among patients who had classic cardiogenic shock with hypotension (P = 0.001). Mortality among 76 patients who presented with a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg but no hypoperfusion was 26%.

Conclusions: Even in the presence of normal blood pressure, clinical signs of peripheral hypoperfusion, which may be subtle, are associated with a substantial risk of in-hospital death following acute myocardial infarction.

Citing Articles

Myocardial Infarction-Associated Shock: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phenotypes, SCAI Classification, and Outcome Assessment.

Dil S, Kercheva M, Panteleev O, Demianov S, Kanev A, Belich N Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(1).

PMID: 39859085 PMC: 11766583. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010103.


Trajectory of Cardiogenic Dementia: A New Perspective.

AlRawili N, Al-Kuraishy H, Al-Gareeb A, Abdel-Fattah M, Al-Harchan N, Alruwaili M J Cell Mol Med. 2025; 29(2):e70345.

PMID: 39828641 PMC: 11742966. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.70345.


Urinary Output as a Predictor of Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock: An Explorative Retrospective Analysis.

Markart S, Hermann A, Chiari F, Heinz G, Speidl W, Lenz M J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768629 PMC: 11677915. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247706.


Clinical outcomes following shock team implementation for cardiogenic shock: a systematic review.

Abdelnabi M, Elsaeidy A, Aboutaleb A, Johanis A, Ghanem A, Rezq H Egypt Heart J. 2024; 76(1):163.

PMID: 39738825 PMC: 11685370. DOI: 10.1186/s43044-024-00594-z.


Mixed Cardiogenic-Vasodilatory Shock: Current Insights and Future Directions.

Jentzer J, Berg D, Chonde M, Dahiya G, Elliott A, Rampersad P JACC Adv. 2024; 4(1):101432.

PMID: 39720581 PMC: 11666941. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101432.