» Articles » PMID: 10753083

The Environmental Genome Project: Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications

Overview
Date 2000 Apr 7
PMID 10753083
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences is supporting a multiyear research initiative examining genetic influences on environmental response. Proponents of this new initiative, known as the Environmental Genome Project, hope that the information learned will improve our understanding of environmentally associated diseases and allow clinicians and public health officials to target disease-prevention strategies to those who are at increased risk. Despite these potential benefits, the project presents several ethical and social challenges. Of immediate concern is the protection of individual research participants. Other ethical issues relate to the application of research results and how study findings could affect social priorities. Clarifying these emerging areas of concern, many of which have not received adequate attention in the existing bioethics literature, is an important step toward minimizing potential research-related risks and defining research needs.

Citing Articles

GADMA: Genetic algorithm for inferring demographic history of multiple populations from allele frequency spectrum data.

Noskova E, Ulyantsev V, Koepfli K, OBrien S, Dobrynin P Gigascience. 2020; 9(3).

PMID: 32112099 PMC: 7049072. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa005.


Detecting gene-environment interactions in human birth defects: Study designs and statistical methods.

Tai C, Graff R, Liu J, Passarelli M, Mefford J, Shaw G Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015; 103(8):692-702.

PMID: 26010994 PMC: 4537677. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23382.


Human genetics, environment, and communities of color: ethical and social implications.

Sze J, Prakash S Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112(6):740-5.

PMID: 15121518 PMC: 1241969. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6731.


Human exposure monitoring and evaluation in the Arctic: the importance of understanding exposures to the development of public health policy.

Suk W, Avakian M, Carpenter D, Groopman J, Scammell M, Wild C Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112(2):113-20.

PMID: 14757538 PMC: 1241818. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6383.


Ethical issues in environmental health research.

Sharp R Environ Health Perspect. 2003; 111(14):1786-8.

PMID: 14594633 PMC: 1241725. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6778.


References
1.
Weijer C . Protecting communities in research: philosophical and pragmatic challenges. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999; 8(4):501-13. DOI: 10.1017/s0963180199004120. View

2.
Schulte P, Lomax G, Ward E, Colligan M . Ethical issues in the use of genetic markers in occupational epidemiologic research. J Occup Environ Med. 1999; 41(8):639-46. DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199908000-00005. View

3.
Juengst E . Groups as gatekeepers to genomic research: conceptually confusing, morally hazardous, and practically useless. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2001; 8(2):183-200. DOI: 10.1353/ken.1998.0010. View

4.
Greely H . The control of genetic research: involving the "groups between". Houst Law Rev. 1997; 33(5):1397-430. View

5.
Edlin G . Inappropriate use of genetic terminology in medical research: a public health issue. Perspect Biol Med. 1987; 31(1):47-56. DOI: 10.1353/pbm.1987.0018. View