» Articles » PMID: 10747111

Clinical Use of Capillary PCR to Diagnose Mycoplasma Pneumonia

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2000 Apr 4
PMID 10747111
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the present study, serologic data were compared with data obtained by capillary PCR to establish the efficacy of capillary PCR for the determination of Mycoplasma infection in samples obtained from throat swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF), and sputum of patients with Mycoplasma pneumonia. We performed PCR analysis for Mycoplasma DNA on a total of 325 samples from 197 patients with community-acquired pneumonia and in whom Mycoplasma pneumonia was suspected. There were 68 PCR-positive specimens. Review of the differences in PCR positivity rates based on the site of specimen collection showed the highest rate of detection (28.6%) from throat swabs. From among the 31 patients with significantly elevated titers of serum Mycoplasma antibodies, the PCR results were positive for 25 patients. Thus, capillary PCR had a sensitivity of 80.6% (25 of 31). Five of the six false-negative results were from throat swab specimens. Moreover, testing (PCR) had been performed only once for these five patients with false-negative results. From among the PCR-positive findings from BALF specimens, there were no false-positive results. BALF specimens were very useful, except for the technical procedures and increased patient burden required to obtain these specimens. We suggest that the use of throat swab specimens in capillary PCR is much more suitable for diagnosing Mycoplasma pneumonia in routine clinical practice; however, careful throat swab specimen collection and an increase in the number of times that the PCR is performed are necessary to reduce the rate of false-negative results.

Citing Articles

Comparative study of diagnostic efficacy of sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens in community-acquired pneumonia children treated with fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Wang L, Lu S, Guo Y, Liu J, Wu P, Yang S BMC Infect Dis. 2023; 23(1):565.

PMID: 37644391 PMC: 10466683. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08522-3.


The diagnostic value of serological tests and real-time polymerase chain reaction in children with acute infection.

Li Q, Dong H, Sun H, Zhang X, Gu W, Huang L Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(6):386.

PMID: 32355830 PMC: 7186703. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.121.


Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the Respiratory Tract and Beyond.

Waites K, Xiao L, Liu Y, Balish M, Atkinson T Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017; 30(3):747-809.

PMID: 28539503 PMC: 5475226. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00114-16.


Comparison of sputum and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for molecular diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila.

Cho M, Kim H, An D, Lee M, Noh S, Kim M Ann Lab Med. 2012; 32(2):133-8.

PMID: 22389880 PMC: 3289778. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.133.


Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in different respiratory specimens.

Xu D, Li S, Chen Z, Du L Eur J Pediatr. 2010; 170(7):851-8.

PMID: 21107602 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-010-1360-y.


References
1.
Foy H, KENNY G, McMahan R, Mansy A, GRAYSTON J . Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in an urban area. Five years of surveillance. JAMA. 1970; 214(9):1666-72. View

2.
Schlag E, Wassarman D . Identifying mutations in Drosophila genes by direct sequencing of PCR products. Biotechniques. 1999; 27(2):262-4. DOI: 10.2144/99272bm09. View

3.
Ehlers S, Smith K . Differentiation of T cell lymphokine gene expression: the in vitro acquisition of T cell memory. J Exp Med. 1991; 173(1):25-36. PMC: 2118764. DOI: 10.1084/jem.173.1.25. View

4.
Wittwer C, Garling D . Rapid cycle DNA amplification: time and temperature optimization. Biotechniques. 1991; 10(1):76-83. View

5.
Weis J, Tan S, Martin B, Wittwer C . Detection of rare mRNAs via quantitative RT-PCR. Trends Genet. 1992; 8(8):263-4. DOI: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90242-v. View