» Articles » PMID: 10740467

The Reproducibility of the Mandibular Cortical Index

Overview
Date 2000 Mar 31
PMID 10740467
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess the reproducibility and diagnostic validity of Mandibular Cortical Index (MCI) when used by minimally trained observers.

Methods: Four 'experts' and 45 final-year dental students classified the appearance of the lower border of the mandibular cortex in 30 panoramic radiographs using the MCI. Experts viewed the original radiographs. The students received instruction in the MCI and viewed slides of the radiographs in a lecture theatre.

Results: For intra-observer agreement, the experts had significantly higher overall values of weighted kappa, indicating substantial agreement in MCI assessment, whereas the students showed moderate agreement. For inter-observer agreement, there was fair agreement between the experts and poor agreement between the students. Using the experts' MCI assessment as the 'gold standard', the mean sensitivity of the students in diagnosis of C3 was 0.71 (maximum 0.95, minimum 0.25) and mean specificity was 0.56 (maximum 0.9, minimum 0.20).

Conclusions: The MCI has important limitations in terms of intra- and inter-observer agreement. Minimal training in its use, such as might be given in a lecture format to dentists, was ineffective and associated with poor inter-observer agreement and limited diagnostic validity in identifying signs of osteoporosis. More lengthy training and experience in using the MCI would be needed for it to be effective as a diagnostic tool in general dental practice.

Citing Articles

Screening ability of dental students to detect osteoporosis on dental panoramic radiographs.

Osanai H, Kuroiwa H, Yamada S, Sugino N, Nakamoto T, Ohtsuka M Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2025; 10(4):145-150.

PMID: 39835324 PMC: 11742331. DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2024.10.002.


Evaluation of change in trabecular bone structure surrounding dental implants by fractal dimension analysis and comparison with radiomorphometric indicators: a retrospective study.

Karadag I, Yilmaz H PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13145.

PMID: 35341061 PMC: 8953503. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13145.


Clinical guidelines for the application of panoramic radiographs in screening for osteoporosis.

Taguchi A, Tanaka R, Kakimoto N, Morimoto Y, Arai Y, Hayashi T Oral Radiol. 2021; 37(2):189-208.

PMID: 33620644 DOI: 10.1007/s11282-021-00518-6.


Is there a relationship between mandibular cortical bone thickness and orthodontic treatment time?.

Landin-Ramos M, Yadav S, Gandhi V, Upadhyay M, Tadinada A Angle Orthod. 2020; 90(6):794-800.

PMID: 33378521 PMC: 8028428. DOI: 10.2319/012220-42.1.


Diagnosis of osteoporosis in dental patients.

Tounta T J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2020; 2(2):21-27.

PMID: 32300679 PMC: 7155378.