Inhibition of Return
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Immediately following an event at a peripheral location there is facilitation for the processing of other stimuli near that location. This is said to reflect a reflexive shift of attention towards the source of stimulation. After attention is removed from such a peripheral location, there is then delayed responding to stimuli subsequently displayed there. This inhibitory aftereffect, first described in 1984 and later labeled 'inhibition of return (IOR)', encourages orienting towards novel locations and hence might facilitate foraging and other search behaviors. Since its relatively recent discovery, IOR has been the subject of intensive investigation, from many angles and with a wide variety of approaches. After describing the seminal contribution of Posner and Cohen ('Who'), this review will discuss what causes IOR and, once initiated, what effects IOR has on subsequent processing ('What'). The time course ('When') and spatial distribution ('Where') of IOR, and what is known about IOR's neural implementation ('How') and functional significance ('Why') are also discussed.
Mengers V, Roth N, Brock O, Obermayer K, Rolfs M J Vis. 2025; 25(2):6.
PMID: 39928323 PMC: 11812614. DOI: 10.1167/jov.25.2.6.
Compostella A, Tagliani M, Vender M, Delfitto D PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318638.
PMID: 39913613 PMC: 11801591. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318638.
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 2: From research question to operationalization.
Hooge I, Nuthmann A, Nystrom M, Niehorster D, Holleman G, Andersson R Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(2):73.
PMID: 39856471 PMC: 11761893. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02590-2.
The strength of confidence is involved in controlling the intensity of attentional allocation.
Yoshida K, Saito R Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2688.
PMID: 39837927 PMC: 11751452. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86160-2.
As Time Goes By: Event File Decay Does Not Unleash Inhibition of Return.
Schopper L, Frings C J Cogn. 2025; 8(1):16.
PMID: 39830228 PMC: 11740711. DOI: 10.5334/joc.422.