Parsonnet Score is a Good Predictor of the Duration of Intensive Care Unit Stay Following Cardiac Surgery
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To investigate the value of the Parsonnet score (PS) in identifying preoperatively patients that are likely to spend < 24 hours on the intensive care unit (ICU) following cardiac surgery.
Method: Prospectively collected data on 5591 patients were analysed. PS, mortality, the length of stay on the ICU (ICU-LOS), number of patients with clinical evidence of stroke, need for haemofiltration, resternotomy for bleeding, tracheostomy, and use of intra-aortic balloon pump were documented as outcomes. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve constructed using PS as a predictor of ICU stay < 24 hours identified a PS of 10 as the best cut off point that would predict ICU-LOS < 24 hours. The patients were therefore stratified by PS into two groups, those with a PS of 0 to 9 (PS 0-9) and those with a PS of 10 and above (PS 10+).
Results: The ROC curve constructed using PS as a predictor of ICU stay < 24 hours had an area under the curve of 0.70 (0.01). The maximum efficiency of the test was at a sensitivity of 0.68. This corresponded to PS 10. The positive predictive value of the test at this score was 90.5%. Patients with PS 0-9 had a mean ICU stay of 1.49 days, while patients with PS 10+ had a mean ICU stay of 2.89 days (p = 0.01). The risk of stroke, use of intra-aortic balloon pump, requirement for haemofiltration, need for tracheostomy, and risk of resternotomy for bleeding were each significantly less in patients with PS 0-9 versus those with a score of PS 10+ (p < 0.01 in all cases). The risk of a single complication was 4.7% (PS 0-9) v 15.2% (PS 10+) (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: PS is an impartial and objective method of predicting postoperative complications and ICU stay < 24 hours. This is of value in selecting a cohort of patients likely to maintain a smooth flow of patients through the cardiothoracic unit when resources are limited to a few free ICU beds.
Outcomes After Prolonged ICU Stays in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients.
Curran T, Sunkara B, Leis A, Lim A, Haft J, Engoren M Fed Pract. 2023; 39(Suppl 5):S6-S11c.
PMID: 36923547 PMC: 10010497. DOI: 10.12788/fp.0300.
Chen Q, Zhang B, Yang J, Mo X, Zhang L, Li M Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:675431.
PMID: 34322526 PMC: 8310912. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.675431.
Li X, Yin C, Li X, Wu W, Cui K BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021; 21(1):334.
PMID: 34233618 PMC: 8265139. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02144-w.
Bootsma I, Scheeren T, De Lange F, Haenen J, Boonstra P, Boerma E J Intensive Care. 2019; 6:85.
PMID: 30607248 PMC: 6307315. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-018-0351-3.
Ghorbani M, Ghaem H, Rezaianzadeh A, Shayan Z, Zand F, Nikandish R Electron Physician. 2018; 10(3):6540-6547.
PMID: 29765580 PMC: 5942576. DOI: 10.19082/6540.