» Articles » PMID: 10722544

Parsonnet Score is a Good Predictor of the Duration of Intensive Care Unit Stay Following Cardiac Surgery

Overview
Journal Heart
Date 2000 Mar 18
PMID 10722544
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of the Parsonnet score (PS) in identifying preoperatively patients that are likely to spend < 24 hours on the intensive care unit (ICU) following cardiac surgery.

Method: Prospectively collected data on 5591 patients were analysed. PS, mortality, the length of stay on the ICU (ICU-LOS), number of patients with clinical evidence of stroke, need for haemofiltration, resternotomy for bleeding, tracheostomy, and use of intra-aortic balloon pump were documented as outcomes. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve constructed using PS as a predictor of ICU stay < 24 hours identified a PS of 10 as the best cut off point that would predict ICU-LOS < 24 hours. The patients were therefore stratified by PS into two groups, those with a PS of 0 to 9 (PS 0-9) and those with a PS of 10 and above (PS 10+).

Results: The ROC curve constructed using PS as a predictor of ICU stay < 24 hours had an area under the curve of 0.70 (0.01). The maximum efficiency of the test was at a sensitivity of 0.68. This corresponded to PS 10. The positive predictive value of the test at this score was 90.5%. Patients with PS 0-9 had a mean ICU stay of 1.49 days, while patients with PS 10+ had a mean ICU stay of 2.89 days (p = 0.01). The risk of stroke, use of intra-aortic balloon pump, requirement for haemofiltration, need for tracheostomy, and risk of resternotomy for bleeding were each significantly less in patients with PS 0-9 versus those with a score of PS 10+ (p < 0.01 in all cases). The risk of a single complication was 4.7% (PS 0-9) v 15.2% (PS 10+) (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: PS is an impartial and objective method of predicting postoperative complications and ICU stay < 24 hours. This is of value in selecting a cohort of patients likely to maintain a smooth flow of patients through the cardiothoracic unit when resources are limited to a few free ICU beds.

Citing Articles

Outcomes After Prolonged ICU Stays in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients.

Curran T, Sunkara B, Leis A, Lim A, Haft J, Engoren M Fed Pract. 2023; 39(Suppl 5):S6-S11c.

PMID: 36923547 PMC: 10010497. DOI: 10.12788/fp.0300.


Predicting Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery Using Machine Learning.

Chen Q, Zhang B, Yang J, Mo X, Zhang L, Li M Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:675431.

PMID: 34322526 PMC: 8310912. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.675431.


Comparison of the prognostic value of SYNTAX score and clinical SYNTAX score on outcomes of Chinese patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

Li X, Yin C, Li X, Wu W, Cui K BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021; 21(1):334.

PMID: 34233618 PMC: 8265139. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02144-w.


Impaired right ventricular ejection fraction after cardiac surgery is associated with a complicated ICU stay.

Bootsma I, Scheeren T, De Lange F, Haenen J, Boonstra P, Boerma E J Intensive Care. 2019; 6:85.

PMID: 30607248 PMC: 6307315. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-018-0351-3.


Predictive factors associated with mortality and discharge in intensive care units: a retrospective cohort study.

Ghorbani M, Ghaem H, Rezaianzadeh A, Shayan Z, Zand F, Nikandish R Electron Physician. 2018; 10(3):6540-6547.

PMID: 29765580 PMC: 5942576. DOI: 10.19082/6540.


References
1.
Blankenhorn D, KRAMSCH D . Reversal of atherosis and sclerosis. The two components of atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1989; 79(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.79.1.1. View

2.
Weintraub W, Jones E, Craver J, Guyton R, Cohen C . Determinants of prolonged length of hospital stay after coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 1989; 80(2):276-84. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.80.2.276. View

3.
Naylor C, Baigrie R, Goldman B, Basinski A . Assessment of priority for coronary revascularisation procedures. Revascularisation Panel and Consensus Methods Group. Lancet. 1990; 335(8697):1070-3. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92640-4. View

4.
Marcus M, Chilian W, Kanatsuka H, Dellsperger K, Eastham C, Lamping K . Understanding the coronary circulation through studies at the microvascular level. Circulation. 1990; 82(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.82.1.1. View

5.
Collinson P . Of bombers, radiologists, and cardiologists: time to ROC. Heart. 1999; 80(3):215-7. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.80.3.215. View