» Articles » PMID: 10721770

Cost Analyses of Adjunct Colony Stimulating Factors for Acute Leukemia: Can They Improve Clinical Decision Making

Overview
Journal Leuk Lymphoma
Specialties Hematology
Oncology
Date 2000 Mar 18
PMID 10721770
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Colony stimulating factors reduce the duration of neutropenia following intensive chemotherapy in a variety of settings, but the advantages in the management of leukemia are inconclusive. The variations in clinical results and the high costs of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have led to confusion over appropriate use for leukemia patients. In this paper, we reviewed published information on costs and cost-effectiveness of growth factors for childhood and adult leukemia patients. Medline and Healthstar databases were searched for original research articles that contain cost or cost-effectiveness analyses of G-CSF (filgrastim) and GM-SCF (sargramostim) in oncology cooperative group trials. Published manuscripts and abstracts presented at national or international oncology conferences were included. The cost of adjunct treatment was evaluated in two studies of pediatric ALL, one study of adult AML, and two studies of AML in older adults (>55 years). The use of G-CSF for children with ALL was associated with reductions in days to ANC recovery, fewer documented infections, a shorter duration of hospitalization, and small (but not significant) additional costs. In adult AML patients, benefits included a shortening of the duration of neutropenia and hospital stays, a lower incidence of infection and febrile episodes, less use of antibiotics, and cost savings of $2,230 and $2,310 in two studies and an increase if $120 in the third study. This summary suggests that economic analyses can provide useful information to assist clinical decision-making. For pediatric ALL patients, this information indicates that G-CSF use is unlikely to have significant cost implications, and its use should be based on clinical considerations. In studies of adult and older adult AML patients, both GM-CSF and G-CSF have clinical benefits and can be expected to lead to a decrease in overall costs.

Citing Articles

Granulopoiesis-stimulating factors to prevent adverse effects in the treatment of malignant lymphoma.

Bohlius J, Herbst C, Reiser M, Schwarzer G, Engert A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; (4):CD003189.

PMID: 18843642 PMC: 7144686. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003189.pub4.


Canadian supportive care recommendations for the management of neutropenia in patients with cancer.

Kouroukis C, Chia S, Verma S, Robson D, Desbiens C, Cripps C Curr Oncol. 2008; 15(1):9-23.

PMID: 18317581 PMC: 2259432. DOI: 10.3747/co.2008.198.


Economic burden of haematological adverse effects in cancer patients: a systematic review.

Liou S, Stephens J, Carpiuc K, Feng W, Botteman M, Hay J Clin Drug Investig. 2007; 27(6):381-96.

PMID: 17506589 DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200727060-00002.


Cost analyses of adjunct colony stimulating factors for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia : can they improve clinical decision making?.

Bennett C, Schumock G Drugs Aging. 2003; 20(7):479-83.

PMID: 12749746 DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200320070-00001.


The role of myelopoietic growth factors in managing cancer in the elderly.

Balducci L, Carreca I Drugs. 2002; 62 Suppl 1:47-63.

PMID: 12479594 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200262001-00004.