» Articles » PMID: 10717005

The Inhibitory Effect of Hormones Associated with Stress on Na Appetite of Sheep

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2000 Mar 16
PMID 10717005
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stress is a large stimulus of Na appetite in rabbits, rats, and mice. This study investigated the influence of some peptides implicated in stress, i.e., adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), and the recently discovered member of the CRF family, urocortin, on the ingestive behavior of sheep. Intracerebroventricular infusion of these peptides over 4 days decreased the need-free Na intake of Na-repleted sheep. Intracerebroventricular infusion of urocortin, however, did not alter Na intake of Na-depleted sheep. Systemic infusion of ACTH increased, whereas systemic infusion of either urocortin or CRF decreased, Na intake of Na-repleted sheep. The increase in Na intake caused by the peripheral infusion of ACTH was blocked by concurrent i.v. infusion of urocortin, substantiating the inhibitory role of this peptide on Na appetite. Central administration of all peptides and i.v. administration of urocortin or urocortin and ACTH combined decreased food intake. Water intake was not directly influenced by the peptides. Rather, decreased water intake, when observed, was secondary to decreased food intake, as determined by pair-feeding experiments. Whereas systemic infusion of ACTH mimics the increase in Na intake observed in several different stressful situations, CRF and urocortin actually inhibit Na intake, indicating a direct central action overriding any effect of these peptides on ACTH release. Indeed, the inhibition of Na intake by urocortin occurred despite its stimulation of ACTH release and the subsequent increase in peripheral level of cortisol. Thus it would appear that hormones associated with stress have both excitatory and inhibitory influences on Na intake. Presumably, other physiological processes entrained by stress also will be important in determining the quantitative outcome on Na appetite.

Citing Articles

Adding salt to foods and risk of incident depression and anxiety.

Wang W, Chang X, Lin F, Feng L, Wang M, Huang J BMC Med. 2025; 23(1):32.

PMID: 39838382 PMC: 11752635. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-03865-x.


Urocortins in the mammalian endocrine system.

Squillacioti C, Pelagalli A, Liguori G, Mirabella N Acta Vet Scand. 2019; 61(1):46.

PMID: 31585551 PMC: 6778379. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-019-0480-2.


Gut-Brain Neuroendocrine Signaling Under Conditions of Stress-Focus on Food Intake-Regulatory Mediators.

Stengel A, Tache Y Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018; 9:498.

PMID: 30210455 PMC: 6122076. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00498.


CRF and urocortin peptides as modulators of energy balance and feeding behavior during stress.

Stengel A, Tache Y Front Neurosci. 2014; 8:52.

PMID: 24672423 PMC: 3957495. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00052.


Insulin and glucagon signaling in the central nervous system.

Filippi B, Abraham M, Yue J, Lam T Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2013; 14(4):365-75.

PMID: 23959343 DOI: 10.1007/s11154-013-9258-4.

References
1.
Denton D . The study of sheep with permanent unilateral parotid fistulae. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1957; 42(1):72-95. DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1957.sp001244. View

2.
Kozicz T, Yanaihara H, Arimura A . Distribution of urocortin-like immunoreactivity in the central nervous system of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1998; 391(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19980202)391:1<1::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-6. View

3.
Ruckebusch Y, Malbert C . Stimulation and inhibition of food intake in sheep by centrally-administered hypothalamic releasing factors. Life Sci. 1986; 38(10):929-34. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(86)90261-4. View

4.
SCOGGINS B, Coghlan J, Denton D, Fan J, McDougall J, Oddie C . Metabolic effects of ACTH in the sheep. Am J Physiol. 1974; 226(1):198-205. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1974.226.1.198. View

5.
Shimizu N, Oomura Y, Kai Y . Stress-induced anorexia in rats mediated by serotonergic mechanisms in the hypothalamus. Physiol Behav. 1989; 46(5):835-41. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(89)90045-0. View