The Meaning of Diagnostic Test Results: a Spreadsheet for Swift Data Analysis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aims: To design a spreadsheet program to: (a) analyse rapidly diagnostic test result data produced in local research or reported in the literature; (b) correct reported predictive values for disease prevalence in any population; (c) estimate the post-test probability of disease in individual patients.
Materials And Methods: Microsoft Excel(TM)was used. Section A: a contingency (2 x 2) table was incorporated into the spreadsheet. Formulae for standard calculations [sample size, disease prevalence, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, predictive values and likelihood ratios (LRs)] were linked to this table. The results change automatically when the data in the true or false negative and positive cells are changed. Section B: this estimates predictive values in any population, compensating for altered disease prevalence. Sections C-F: Bayes' theorem was incorporated to generate individual post-test probabilities. The spreadsheet generates 95% confidence intervals, LRs and a table and graph of conditional probabilities once the sensitivity and specificity of the test are entered. The latter shows the expected post-test probability of disease for any pre-test probability when a test of known sensitivity and specificity is positive or negative.
Results: This spreadsheet can be used on desktop and palmtop computers. The MS Excel(TM)version can be downloaded via the Internet from the URL ftp://radiography.com/pub/Rad-data99.xls
Conclusion: A spreadsheet is useful for contingency table data analysis and assessment of the clinical meaning of diagnostic test results.
Tang E, Dano S, Edwards N, Macanovic S, Ford H, Bartlett S Qual Life Res. 2021; 31(2):597-605.
PMID: 34138450 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02910-5.
Hosnijeh F, Kolijn P, Casabonne D, Nieters A, Solans M, Naudin S Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):13814.
PMID: 32796953 PMC: 7429856. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70790-9.
Chirife A, Villasante N, Rojas Bilbao E, Casas G J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019; 145(7):1709-1718.
PMID: 31030273 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-02923-1.
Kok R, Verbeek J, Faber B, van Dijk F, Hoving J BMJ Open. 2015; 5(5):e006315.
PMID: 25991444 PMC: 4442145. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006315.
How to perform a critical appraisal of diagnostic tests: 7 steps.
Chughtai A, Kelly A, Cronin P Pediatr Radiol. 2015; 45(6):793-803.
PMID: 25573242 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3202-y.