» Articles » PMID: 10694353

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies on the Association Between Maternal Cigarette Smoking and Preterm Delivery

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2000 Feb 29
PMID 10694353
Citations 158
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We have attempted to quantify the most up-to-date estimate of the association between cigarette smoking by the mother and preterm delivery. Studies were selected for inclusion in this review if they were prospective, reported data stratified across at least two levels of maternal smoking, and defined preterm delivery on the basis of gestational age. In a meta-analysis we combined results from multiple studies that reported on preterm delivery and maternal smoking during pregnancy. Pooled odds ratios were computed for various strata of smoking intensity with the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model. Twenty studies met all inclusion criteria and were included in meta-analysis. The pooled point estimate from 20 prospective studies on any maternal smoking versus no maternal smoking was 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.33). Subgroup analyses stratifying maternal smoking on number of cigarettes per day suggest a dose-response relationship at low to moderate levels of smoking, which was not further increased at high levels of smoking. A nonsignificant level of publication bias appears to exist in the smoking-preterm delivery literature. Cigarette smoking is a preventable risk factor that is associated with preterm delivery. Consistent results across many study populations and research designs and evidence of a dose-response relationship support its causal role in preterm delivery.

Citing Articles

Social and geographical disparities in adverse birth outcomes in Alaska: a retrospective cohort study.

Smith M, Vertigan T, Athauda N, Hahn M BMJ Public Health. 2025; 3(1):e001457.

PMID: 40017923 PMC: 11843483. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001457.


Predicting preterm birth using electronic medical records from multiple prenatal visits.

Huang C, Long X, van der Ven M, Kaptein M, Oei S, van den Heuvel E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):843.

PMID: 39709388 PMC: 11662559. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07049-y.


Effects of PM2.5 exposure during high bushfire smoke days on birthweight and gestational age in Hunter New England, NSW, Australia. A study on pregnant people who smoke and don't smoke.

Birtill M, Amos J, Nash E, Zawal L, Moeller C, Kumar R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27980.

PMID: 39543305 PMC: 11564558. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78199-4.


Association between Perinatal Outcomes and Maternal Risk Factors: A Cohort Study.

Martin-Alonso R, Prieto P, Fernandez-Buhigas I, German-Fernandez C, Aramburu C, Piqueras V Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(7).

PMID: 39064500 PMC: 11278671. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071071.


Early life exposure to cigarette smoking and adult and old-age male mortality: Evidence from linked US full-count census and mortality data.

Helgertz J, Warren J Demogr Res. 2024; 49:651-692.

PMID: 38464697 PMC: 10923319. DOI: 10.4054/demres.2023.49.25.


References
1.
Secker-Walker R, Vacek P, Flynn B, Mead P . Smoking in pregnancy, exhaled carbon monoxide, and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89(5 Pt 1):648-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00103-8. View

2.
Obel E . Pregnancy complications following legally induced abortion: an analysis of the population with special reference to prematurity. Dan Med Bull. 1979; 26(4):192-9. View

3.
Ekwo E, Gosselink C, Moawad A . Previous pregnancy outcomes and subsequent risk of preterm rupture of amniotic sac membranes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 100(6):536-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15304.x. View

4.
Henriksen T, Wilcox A, Hedegaard M, Secher N . Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Epidemiology. 1995; 6(5):533-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199509000-00012. View

5.
Ahlborg Jr G, Bodin L . Tobacco smoke exposure and pregnancy outcome among working women. A prospective study at prenatal care centers in Orebro County, Sweden. Am J Epidemiol. 1991; 133(4):338-47. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115886. View