» Articles » PMID: 10693897

Validation of the United States' Version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Instrument

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2000 Feb 29
PMID 10693897
Citations 144
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In 1991, the World Health Organization initiated a project to simultaneously develop a quality of life (QOL) instrument in 15 countries: The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. This was intended as a generic QOL tool for use with patients across varying disease types, severities of illness, and cultural subgroups. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the WHOQOL-100 in the U.S., one of the original 15 participating countries. The WHOQOL is a 100-item self-report instrument consisting of 24 subscales within six domains: Physical, Psychological, Independence, Social, Environment, and Spiritual. Four additional items pertain to overall QOL/health. We tested the WHOQOL-100 (U.S. version) in a sample of 443 adults (n = 251 chronically ill, n = 128 healthy, and n = 64 childbearing) in the U.S. to test its reliability (internal consistency, test-retest), construct validity (convergent, discriminant), responsiveness, and factor structure. The WHOQOL-100 (U.S. version) has acceptable internal consistency (alpha range: 0.82-0.95 across domains) and reproducibility (ICC range: 0.83-0.96 at 2-week retest interval). It is responsive to change in clinical conditions, as evidenced by predicted score change (effect size) in women after childbirth. Construct validity was demonstrated by (1) its correlation with the Short Form-36 and Subjective Quality of Life Profile, and (2) its ability to discriminate between the diverse samples in this study. The conceptual structure was confirmed exactly with the exception of four facets that did not correlate most highly with the domains to which they were originally assigned, but these differences were minor. The WHOQOL measurement system is suitable for evaluating the QOL of adults in the U.S. The psychometric properties will be continually evaluated as more data become available in the U.S.

Citing Articles

Influence of anterior open bite on oral health-related quality of life. A systematic review.

Rodriguez-Huaringa J, Vargas-Mori G, Arriola-Guillen L J Clin Exp Dent. 2025; 17(1):e87-e95.

PMID: 39958242 PMC: 11829720. DOI: 10.4317/jced.62398.


Quality of life among healthcare workers in the hospitals and primary healthcare centers in Gaza Strip: a cross-sectional study.

Younis J, Wang L, Abed A, Jiang H, Fan Y, Li Z BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):69.

PMID: 39856745 PMC: 11763158. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02386-9.


Exploring Social-Ecological Pathways From Sexual Identity to Sleep Among Chinese Women: Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.

Wu C, Chau P, Choi E JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025; 11:e53549.

PMID: 39840408 PMC: 11774323. DOI: 10.2196/53549.


Interrelationships of stress, burnout, anxiety, depression, quality of life and suicidality among Chinese residents under Standardized Residency Training: a network analysis.

Li Z, Wu M, Zhang X, Yan K, Wang X, Xu H Ann Med. 2024; 56(1):2433030.

PMID: 39610267 PMC: 11610237. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2433030.


Treatment Adherence and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients with Hypertension at Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Lalitpur, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Rupakheti B, Kc B, Bista D, Kc S, Pandey K Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:2077-2090.

PMID: 39371197 PMC: 11453163. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S476104.