» Articles » PMID: 10688508

Does a Discrepancy Between Gestational Age Determined by Biparietal Diameter and Last Menstrual Period Sometimes Signify Early Intrauterine Growth Retardation?

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2000 Feb 25
PMID 10688508
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the association between gestational age estimated from the last menstrual period (GA(LMP)) or from the biparietal diameter (GA(BPD)), and the subsequent birthweight for gestational age.

Design: Population-based follow up study.

Setting: Of 21,936 pregnancies contained in the ultrasound database, 16,387 singleton pregnancies with a reliable last menstrual period date and an ultrasound examination between 12 and 22 weeks of gestation were included.

Main Outcome Measures: Correlation between: 1) birthweight deviation (birthweight-expected weight for gestation); 2) birthweight; and 3) pregnancy length and (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)). Relative risk of birthweight < 2,500 g and low birthweight for gestation (> 22% below normal weight) related to five levels of discrepancy between (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)).

Results: (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)) was not associated with deviation of birthweight related to GA(BPD). However the risk of low birthweight (< 2,500 g) and low birthweight for gestational age was significantly increased when (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)) was > 7 days.

Conclusion: A biparietal diameter smaller than expected from the last menstrual period date is mainly a problem of an error related to estimated time of ovulation. At the same time the relative risk of a low birthweight infant is slightly increased.

Citing Articles

Slow fetal growth between first and early second trimester ultrasound scans and risk of small for gestational age (SGA) birth.

Simic M, Stephansson O, Petersson G, Cnattingius S, Wikstrom A PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0184853.

PMID: 28934257 PMC: 5608242. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184853.


Validation of obstetric estimate using early ultrasound: 2007 California birth certificates.

Barradas D, Dietz P, Pearl M, England L, Callaghan W, Kharrazi M Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013; 28(1):3-10.

PMID: 24117928 PMC: 4741369. DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12083.


Correction of systematic bias in ultrasound dating in studies of small-for-gestational-age birth: an example from the Iowa Health in Pregnancy Study.

Harland K, Saftlas A, Wallis A, Yankowitz J, Triche E, Zimmerman M Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 176(5):443-55.

PMID: 22886591 PMC: 3499119. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws120.


Early childhood development when second-trimester ultrasound dating disagrees with last menstrual period: a prospective cohort study.

Grewal J, Wernicke M, Zhang J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012; 12:32.

PMID: 22545943 PMC: 3495038. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-32.