» Articles » PMID: 10685492

Endoscopic Foraminotomy Using MED System in Cadaveric Specimens

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2000 Feb 24
PMID 10685492
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Four cadavers had cervical foraminotomies performed at noncontiguous levels using either the standard open technique or the microendoscopic technique.

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of using a minimally invasive technique for posterior decompression of cervical disc disease.

Summary Of Background Data: Even though the anterior approach is more commonly performed for the treatment of cervical disc disease, the posterior approach has distinct advantages in selected cases of foraminal stenosis and posterolateral disc herniation. Current technique, however, requires extensive muscle dissection, and is, therefore, subject to significant morbidity.

Methods: Each of four cadavers had posterior cervical foraminotomies performed using either the MICROENDOSCOPIC (MED) technique, or the standard open technique. Three noncontiguous levels were decompressed using one technique, and the other technique was used for the adjacent contralateral decompression. Each specimen was then evaluated with postoperative myelogram/CT and open dissection. Laminotomy size, length of root decompressed, and percentage of facet removed were measured.

Results: Average vertical diameter decompression and percentage of facet removed were significantly greater for the MED technique than for the open technique. Transverse diameter of the laminotomy area and the average length of decompressed root were not significantly different between the techniques.

Conclusion: Posterior cervical foraminotomy, using the microendoscopic technique, is technically feasible and may be applicable to the treatment of foraminal stenosis and laterally located cervical disc herniation. Studies in live animals are currently examining techniques for hemostasis.

Citing Articles

Hidden blood loss and risk factors in percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy.

Wang F, Yang Y Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024; 36(1):24-30.

PMID: 39719898 PMC: 11734842. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1872.


Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical fusion and arthroplasty: Systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

Fang H, Cui M, Zhao K, Zhang Y, Zeng X, Yang C Brain Spine. 2024; 4:102852.

PMID: 39036750 PMC: 11260383. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102852.


Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Keyhole Foraminotomy versus Microscopic Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single Level Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy.

Ma W, Peng Y, Zhang S, Wang Y, Gan K, Zhao X Int J Gen Med. 2022; 15:6897-6907.

PMID: 36061960 PMC: 9439641. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S378837.


The first experience with fully endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy and discectomy for radiculopathy performed in Viet Duc University Hospital.

Dinh S, Dinh H Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):8314.

PMID: 35585151 PMC: 9117311. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12493-x.


Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion and Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Platt A, Fessler R, Traynelis V, OToole J Global Spine J. 2021; 12(7):1573-1582.

PMID: 34879736 PMC: 9393980. DOI: 10.1177/21925682211055094.