» Articles » PMID: 10663352

Forearm Bone Mineral Densitometry Cannot Be Used to Monitor Response to Alendronate Therapy in Postmenopausal Women

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2000 Feb 9
PMID 10663352
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Alendronate significantly increases bone mass and reduces hip and spine fractures in postmenopausal women. To determine whether forearm densitometry could be used to monitor the efficacy of alendronate, we examined changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the forearm (one-third distal, mid-distal, ultradistal radius) versus changes at the hip (femoral neck, total hip) and spine (posteroanterior and lateral) in a double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 120 elderly women (mean age 70 +/- 4 years) treated with alendronate for 2.5 years. We found that among women in the treatment group, BMD increased by 4.0-12.2% at the hip and spine sites (all p<0.001), whereas BMD increased only nominally at the one-third distal radius (1.3%, p<0.001) and mid-radius (0.8%, p<0.05), and remained stable at the ultradistal radius. At baseline, forearm BMD correlated with that of the hip (r = 0.55-0.64, p<0.001), femoral neck (r = 0.54-0.61, p<0.001) and posteroanterior spine (r = 0.56-0.63, p<0.001). Changes in radial BMD after 1 year of therapy were not correlated with changes in hip and spine BMD after 2.5 years of therapy. In contrast, short-term changes in total hip and spine BMD were generally positively associated with long-term changes in total hip, femoral neck and spine BMD (r = 0.30-0.71, p<0.05). Furthermore, long-term BMD changes at the forearm did not correlate with long-term hip and spine BMD changes, in contrast to the moderate correlations seen between spine and hip BMD at 2.5 years (r = 0.38-0.45, p<0.01). We conclude that neither short- nor long-term changes in forearm BMD predict long-term changes in overall BMD for elderly women on alendronate therapy, suggesting that measurements of clinically relevant central sites (hip and spine) are necessary to assess therapeutic efficacy.

Citing Articles

The correlation between bone mineral density measured at the forearm and at the lumbar spine or femoral neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Papa M, Ceolin C, Simonato C, Termini G, Vilona F, Ruggiero A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):151.

PMID: 39953461 PMC: 11827141. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08376-7.


Utility and validation of bone mineral density measurements at forearm in predicting trabecular microarchitecture and central-site osteoporosis in aging Indian postmenopausal women-a promising surrogate?.

Gautam K, Cherian K, Kapoor N, Thomas N, Paul T Aging Med (Milton). 2022; 5(1):30-37.

PMID: 35309158 PMC: 8917263. DOI: 10.1002/agm2.12191.


Cortical bone mineral density is increased by the cathepsin K inhibitor ONO-5334, which leads to a robust increase in bone strength: results from a 16-month study in ovariectomised cynomolgus monkeys.

Yamada H, Ochi Y, Mori H, Nishikawa S, Hashimoto Y, Tanaka M J Bone Miner Metab. 2018; 37(4):636-647.

PMID: 30357565 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-018-0968-2.


Are we taking full advantage of the growing number of pharmacological treatment options for osteoporosis?.

Jepsen K, Schlecht S, Kozloff K Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2014; 16:64-71.

PMID: 24747363 PMC: 4072502. DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2014.03.006.


Peripheral bone density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Franck H, Gottwalt J Clin Rheumatol. 2009; 28(10):1141-5.

PMID: 19529880 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-009-1211-2.