Population Variation in Osteological Aging Criteria: an Example from the Pubic Symphysis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
A fundamental assumption made by skeletal biologists is that both the pattern and rate of age-related morphological changes observed in modern reference populations are not significantly different than in past populations. In this brief exploration, the composition of a single reference and two independent, known-age, target samples are evaluated for the pubic symphysis. Differences in the timing of age-progressive changes between the reference and target samples are observed, and in particular, females demonstrated a pattern that was fundamentally different from the reference sample. These results serve as a cautionary note for the use of osteological aging criteria and issues of representativeness for modern standards.
A review of methods of age estimation based on postmortem computed tomography.
Barszcz M, Wozniak K Forensic Sci Res. 2025; 10(1):owae036.
PMID: 39990697 PMC: 11839505. DOI: 10.1093/fsr/owae036.
Pefferkorn E, Guillerme O, Saint-Martin P, Savall F, Dedouit F, Telmon N Int J Legal Med. 2024; 138(6):2707-2715.
PMID: 39162803 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03316-x.
Stull K, Chu E, Corron L, Price M R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(3):220963.
PMID: 36866077 PMC: 9974299. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220963.
Inter-population differences in acetabular senescence: relevance in age-at-death estimation.
San-Millan M, Rissech C Int J Legal Med. 2023; 137(3):701-719.
PMID: 36723664 PMC: 10085928. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-023-02954-x.
Cappella A, Bertoglio B, Di Maso M, Mazzarelli D, Affatato L, Stacchiotti A Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(8).
PMID: 36009828 PMC: 9405280. DOI: 10.3390/biology11081202.