» Articles » PMID: 10632408

Sperm Deposition Site During ICSI Affects Fertilization and Development

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2000 Jan 13
PMID 10632408
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of sperm placement during ICSI relative to the M-II spindle location on fertilization and preimplantation development.

Design: Retrospective analysis of oocyte fertilization and embryo development with respect to sperm deposition site during ICSI.

Setting: A program of IVF-ET.

Patient(s): Seven hundred seventy-six patients.

Intervention(s): Egg quality, sperm deposition site, and polar-body position were recorded during ICSI; fertilization was assessed on day 1; embryo development was evaluated on days 2 and 3.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Fertilization, embryo development, and implantation rates.

Result(s): Normal fertilization is not affected by polar-body orientation, with the exception of a significantly lower fertilization rate from a 9 o'clock polar-body orientation. Injections with the polar-body positioned at 7 or 11 o'clock result in the greatest number of high-quality embryos, significantly more than the adjacent 6 or 12 o'clock polar-body orientations and irrespective of oocyte anomaly frequency. Embryos originating from the 7 or 11 o'clock polar-body category implant at a higher rate, although the data are not significant.

Conclusion(s): The placement of the sperm during ICSI relative to the presumed location of the meiotic spindle significantly impacts fertilization and high-quality embryo development. Sperm deposition in the M-II spindle area should be avoided. It appears that development, and not fertilization, is improved by decreasing the distance between the sperm cell and the spindle.

Citing Articles

Animal and vegetal materials of mouse oocytes segregate at first zygotic cleavage: a simple mechanism that makes the two-cell blastomeres differ reciprocally from the start.

Nolte T, Halabian R, Israel S, Suzuki Y, Avelar R, Palmer D Mol Hum Reprod. 2025; 31(1.

PMID: 39786543 PMC: 11741683. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaae045.


Should ICSI be implemented on patients with poor-quality embryos in the previous IVF cycle?.

Wang J, Xiong S, Gao Y, Xia F, Wei B, Zou J Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e17996.

PMID: 37483760 PMC: 10362230. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17996.


ICSI in non-male factor infertility patients does not alter metabolomic signature in sibling embryos as evidenced by sensitivity enhanced nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.

Jijo A, Cheredath A, Uppangala S, R V, Joseph D, Meitei H PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0273321.

PMID: 36149910 PMC: 9506644. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273321.


Is intracytoplasmic sperm (ICSI) better than traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF): confirmation of higher blastocyst rates per oocyte using a split insemination design.

Sauerbrun-Cutler M, Huber 3rd W, Has P, Shen C, Hackett R, Alvero R J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020; 37(7):1661-1667.

PMID: 32436048 PMC: 7376810. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01819-1.


Metabolic profile of in vitro derived human embryos is not affected by the mode of fertilization.

Leary C, Sturmey R Mol Hum Reprod. 2020; 26(4):277-287.

PMID: 32059054 PMC: 8598873. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaaa015.