» Articles » PMID: 10622010

Sex and Attitude: a Randomized Vignette Study of the Management of Depression by General Practitioners

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2000 Jan 6
PMID 10622010
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The management and detection of depression varies widely, and the causes of variation are incompletely understood.

Aims: To describe and explain general practitioners' (GPs') current practice in the recognition and management of depression in young adults, their attitudes towards depression, and to investigate associations of GP characteristics and patient sex with management.

Method: All GP principals in the Greater Glasgow Health Board were randomized to receive questionnaires with vignettes describing increasingly severe symptoms of depression in either male or female patients, and asked to indicate which clinical options they would be likely to take. The Depression Attitude Questionnaire was used to elicit GP attitudes.

Results: As the severity of vignette symptoms increased, GPs responded by changing their prescribing and referral patterns. For the most severe vignette, the majority of GPs would prescribe drugs (76.4%) and refer the patient for further help (73.7%). Male and female patients were treated differently: GPs were less likely to ask female patients than male patients to attend a follow-up consultation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55), and female GPs were less likely to refer female patients (OR = 0.33). GPs with a pessimistic view of depression, measured using the 'inevitable course of depression' attitude scale, were less willing to be actively involved in its treatment, being less likely to discuss a non-physical cause of symptoms (OR = 0.77) or to explore social factors in moderately severe cases (OR = 0.68).

Conclusions: Accepting the limitations of the method, GPs appear to respond appropriately to increasingly severe symptoms of depression, although variation in management exists. Educational programmes should be developed with the aim of enhancing GP attitudes towards depression, and the effects on detection and management of depression should be rigorously evaluated.

Citing Articles

Knowledge and Behavior of Primary Care Physicians Regarding Utilization of Standardized Tools in Screening and Assessment of Anxiety, Depression, and Mood Disorders at a Large Integrated Health System.

Waheed A, Afridi A, Rana M, Arif M, Barrera T, Patel F J Prim Care Community Health. 2024; 15:21501319231224711.

PMID: 38327064 PMC: 10851721. DOI: 10.1177/21501319231224711.


"Every structure we're taught goes out the window": General practitioners' experiences of providing help for patients with emotional concerns'.

Parker D, Byng R, Dickens C, McCabe R Health Soc Care Community. 2019; 28(1):260-269.

PMID: 31621140 PMC: 6916159. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12860.


Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians' decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies.

Evans S, Roberts M, Keeley J, Blossom J, Amaro C, Garcia A Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018; 15(2):160-170.

PMID: 30487833 PMC: 6224682. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001.


Primary care physicians' perceived barriers on the management of depression in China primary care settings.

Chen S, Conwell Y, Cerulli C, Xue J, Chiu H Asian J Psychiatr. 2018; 36:54-59.

PMID: 29966887 PMC: 6173978. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.06.019.


Factors contributing to the recognition of anxiety and depression in general practice.

Sinnema H, Terluin B, Volker D, Wensing M, van Balkom A BMC Fam Pract. 2018; 19(1):99.

PMID: 29935537 PMC: 6015659. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0784-8.


References
1.
Goldberg D, Blackwell B . Psychiatric illness in general practice. A detailed study using a new method of case identification. Br Med J. 1970; 1(5707):439-43. PMC: 1700485. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5707.439. View

2.
Paykel E, Priest R . Recognition and management of depression in general practice: consensus statement. BMJ. 1992; 305(6863):1198-202. PMC: 1883802. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.305.6863.1198. View

3.
Marks J, Goldberg D, Hillier V . Determinants of the ability of general practitioners to detect psychiatric illness. Psychol Med. 1979; 9(2):337-53. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700030853. View

4.
Zeger S, Liang K . Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986; 42(1):121-30. View

5.
Gask L, McGrath G, Goldberg D, Millar T . Improving the psychiatric skills of established general practitioners: evaluation of group teaching. Med Educ. 1987; 21(4):362-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00377.x. View