» Articles » PMID: 10620228

Community Structure of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in a Pinus Muricata Forest: Minimal Overlap Between the Mature Forest and Resistant Propagule Communities

Overview
Journal Mol Ecol
Date 2000 Jan 5
PMID 10620228
Citations 103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We have investigated colonization strategies by comparing the abundance and frequency of ectomycorrhizal fungal species on roots in a mature Pinus muricata forest with those present as resistant propagules colonizing potted seedlings grown in the same soil samples. Thirty-seven fungal species were distinguished by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs); most were identified to species level by sporocarp RFLP matches or to genus/family level by using sequence databases for the mitochondrial and nuclear large-subunit rRNA genes. The below-ground fungal community found in the mature forest contrasted markedly with the resistant propagule community, as only four species were found in both communities. The dominant species in the mature forest were members of the Russulaceae, Thelephorales and Amanitaceae. In contrast, the resistant propagule community was dominated by Rhizopogon species and by species of the Ascomycota. Only one species, Tomentella sublilacina (Thelephorales), was common in both communities. The spatial distribution of mycorrhizae on mature roots and propagules in the soil differed among the dominant species. For example, T. sublilacina mycorrhizae exhibited a unique bias toward the organic horizons, Russula brevipes mycorrhizae were denser and more clumped than those of other species and Cenococcum propagules were localized, whereas R. subcaerulescens propagules were evenly distributed. We suggest that species differences in resource preferences and colonization strategies, such as those documented here, contribute to the maintenance of species richness in the ectomycorrhizal community.

Citing Articles

High Spatial but Low Temporal Variability in Ectomycorrhizal Community Composition in Forest Stands.

Unuk Nahberger T, Kraigher H, Grebenc T Microorganisms. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40005675 PMC: 11858566. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13020308.


Abundances of ectomycorrhizal exploration types show the type-dependent temporal dynamics over the seasons-a controlled growth container experiment.

Izumi H Int Microbiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39126446 DOI: 10.1007/s10123-024-00573-z.


Genomic and morphological characterization of Knufia obscura isolated from the Mars 2020 spacecraft assembly facility.

Chander A, Teixeira M, Singh N, Williams M, Parker C, Leo P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12249.

PMID: 38806503 PMC: 11133487. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61115-1.


Interspecific selection in a diverse mycorrhizal symbiosis.

Rua M, Hoeksema J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12151.

PMID: 38802437 PMC: 11130337. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62815-4.


Soil mycobiomes in native European aspen forests and hybrid aspen plantations have a similar fungal richness but different compositions, mainly driven by edaphic and floristic factors.

Rahn E, Lutter R, Riit T, Tullus T, Tullus A, Tedersoo L Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1372938.

PMID: 38774505 PMC: 11106484. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1372938.