» Articles » PMID: 10592147

Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Low Birth Weight: a Hazard in the Workplace?

Overview
Date 1999 Dec 11
PMID 10592147
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Low birth weight (LBW) increases infant morbidity and mortality worldwide. One well-established risk factor is maternal smoking. Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure has recently been focused on as another potential risk factor. In this article, we review epidemiologic literature on the effects of ETS on LBW and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), the cause of LBW related to maternal smoking. As we consider the feasibility of modifying women's exposure, we focus our discussion on workplace exposure to ETS. The workplace is particularly important to consider because women of child-bearing age are present in the workplace in greater numbers now than ever before. In addition, certain subgroups of working women may be particularly at risk from the effects of ETS on pregnancy because they work in environments with higher exposure or they are more susceptible to its effects. We conclude that there is consistent evidence to relate maternal ETS exposure to an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and that this association may be generalized to the work environment. In studies with positive findings, infants exposed to ETS antenatally were 1.5-4 times more likely to be born with LBW, but few studies examined LBW. Most studies looked at measures of IUGR. ETS was associated with reductions in birth weight (adjusted for gestational age) ranging from 25 to 90 g. Infants born to women exposed to ETS were generally 2-4 times more likely to be born small-for-gestational age. ETS exposure in the workplace can and should be minimized to protect pregnant women from its adverse effects.

Citing Articles

Maternal occupational exposures during early stages of pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in the NINFEA birth-cohort.

dErrico A, Popovic M, Pizzi C, Moirano G, Moccia C, Richiardi L PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313085.

PMID: 39808632 PMC: 11731713. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313085.


The Effect of Active and Passive Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy on the Uterine Artery Blood Flow and Obstetric Outcomes: A Prospective Study.

Baki Yildirim S, Ayaydin Yilmaz K, Gulerman C Cureus. 2023; 15(2):e35270.

PMID: 36968865 PMC: 10035949. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35270.


Association between maternal lifestyle factors and low birth weight in preterm and term births: a case-control study.

Xi C, Luo M, Wang T, Wang Y, Wang S, Guo L Reprod Health. 2020; 17(1):93.

PMID: 32527333 PMC: 7291563. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-020-00932-9.


Arsenic and birth outcomes in a predominately lower income Hispanic pregnancy cohort in Los Angeles.

Howe C, Farzan S, Garcia E, Jursa T, Iyer R, Berhane K Environ Res. 2020; 184:109294.

PMID: 32145549 PMC: 7103498. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109294.


Social determinants of smoke exposure during pregnancy: Findings from waves 1 & 2 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

Do E, Green T, Prom-Wormley E, Fuemmeler B Prev Med Rep. 2018; 12:312-320.

PMID: 30406010 PMC: 6218644. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.020.


References
1.
Comstock G, LUNDIN Jr F . Parental smoking and perinatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967; 98(5):708-18. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(67)90185-8. View

2.
Yerushalmy J . The relationship of parents' cigarette smoking to outcome of pregnancy--implications as to the problem of inferring causation from observed associations. Am J Epidemiol. 1971; 93(6):443-56. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121278. View

3.
Fedrick J, Anderson A . Factors associated with spontaneous pre-term birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1976; 83(5):342-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1976.tb00840.x. View

4.
Asmussen I . Ultrastructure of the villi and fetal capillaries in placentas from smoking and nonsmoking mothers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980; 87(3):239-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04527.x. View

5.
Berkowitz G . An epidemiologic study of preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 1981; 113(1):81-92. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113068. View