» Articles » PMID: 10591759

[Operative Versus Non Operative Treatment of Odontoid Non Unions. How Dangerous is It Not to Stabilize a Non Union of the Dens?]

Overview
Journal Chirurg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1999 Dec 11
PMID 10591759
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Injuries precede the vast majority of all odontoid pseudarthroses. Because of specific anatomic conditions type II injuries lead more often than other types to non unions. For its development insufficient internal or external fixation and a persisting fracture gap are crucial.

Methods And Results: In 71 patients after operative stabilization of odontoid fractures with two anterior lag-screws we detected 8 non unions. In 3 patients the interval between accident and operation amounted to more than 5 weeks, seven times we did not succeed in closing the fracture gap. Technical mistakes like insufficient reduction (n = 1) or screw misplacement (n = 3) were additional reasons. According to the literature and own observations an os odontoideum must be considered in most instances as a pseudarthrosis after a lesion of the subdental synchondrosis in childhood. The most important diagnostic tool in odontoid non unions is a dynamic examination of the upper cervical spine under fluoroscopic control in maximum flexion and extension. We propose a classification of posttraumatic dens non unions into 4 types. Type I corresponds to a stable "non union" in approximate anatomical position of the dens and without signs of instability in the former fracture zone. Type II describes a relatively stable grossly displaced non union that is not to be reduced by simple, closed means. Type III means an unstable non union and Type IV a posttraumatic os odontoideum.

Conclusions: Therapeutical recommendations need to be differentiated. Unstable non unions are most often responsible for persistent pain, may result in acute or chronic myelopathy++ and therefore - as well as ossa odontoidea - need operative fixation. In considerably displaced non unions a closed reduction manoeuver with long term traction should be tried. The operative treatment of choice is the posterior transarticular screw fixation C1/C2 desirably in a percutaneous technique. Tight, "stable" pseudarthroses in the sense of a persisting fracture gap in painfree patients should first be controlled radiologically. If the odontoid position remains unchanged, non operative treatment may be continued.

Citing Articles

[Conservative treatment of injuries to the cervical spine : Mobilization or immobilization].

Arras C, Kylies J, Viezens L, Leonhardt L Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024; 128(2):96-102.

PMID: 39636395 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-024-01507-0.


Using Frailty Measures to Predict Functional Outcomes and Mortality After Type II Odontoid Fracture in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Hamrick F, Sherrod B, Cole K, Cox P, Croci D, Bowers C Global Spine J. 2023; 14(5):1552-1562.

PMID: 36626221 PMC: 11394509. DOI: 10.1177/21925682221149394.


Reevaluation of a classification system: stable and unstable odontoid fractures in geriatric patients-a radiological outcome measurement.

Deluca A, Wichlas F, Deininger C, Traweger A, Mueller E Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022; 48(4):2967-2976.

PMID: 35597894 PMC: 9360123. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-01985-0.


Cervical spine fractures in the elderly: morbidity and mortality after operative treatment.

Sander A, El Saman A, Delfosse P, Wutzler S, Meier S, Marzi I Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016; 39(5):469-76.

PMID: 26815442 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-013-0311-5.


[Subdental synchondrosis. Computed tomographic and histologic investigation on morphological aspects of fracture at the base of the dens in 36 human axis specimens].

Gebauer M, Barvencik F, Beil F, Lohse C, Pogoda P, Puschel K Unfallchirurg. 2007; 110(2):97-103.

PMID: 17221176 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1201-7.