Mental Health Benefit Limits and Cost Sharing Under Managed Care: a National Survey of Employers
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Mental health services experts suggest that managed care diminishes the need for arbitrary benefit limits and consumer cost-sharing. Data from 577 health plans were used to test the hypotheses that health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and carve-out plans are less likely to use benefit limits or service exclusions, have more generous limits, and have lower cost-sharing requirements than non-HMOs and non-carve-out plans. The results show that HMOs were more likely to use service exclusions and did not make less use of benefit limits. Carve-outs were less likely to use some coverage exclusions. Comparisons of the stringency of limits and cost-sharing provisions did not show consistent differences.
Friedman S, Ettner S, Chuang E, Azocar F, Harwood J, Xu H J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2019; 22(2):43-59.
PMID: 31319375 PMC: 10027396.
A Comparison of Benefit Limits in Mental Health.
Olesiuk W, Sweeney H, Seiber E, Zhu H, Schweikhart S, Shoben A Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015; 43(4):524-34.
PMID: 25966651 PMC: 4644099. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-015-0656-7.
The TEFRA medicaid eligibility option for children with severe disabilities: a national study.
Semansky R, Koyanagi C J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004; 31(3):334-42.
PMID: 15263871 DOI: 10.1007/BF02287295.
A test of mental health parity: comparisons of outcomes of hospital concurrent utilization review.
Murray M, Henriques J J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004; 31(3):266-78.
PMID: 15263866 DOI: 10.1007/BF02287290.