» Articles » PMID: 10575614

Identification and Characterization of Enterococcus Species Isolated from Forage Crops and Their Influence on Silage Fermentation

Overview
Journal J Dairy Sci
Date 1999 Nov 27
PMID 10575614
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Forty-eight strains of lactic acid bacteria were isolated from forage crops, and their identification, characterization and influence on silage fermentation were studied. All isolates were Gram-positive, short-chain-forming, catalase-negative, and facultatively anaerobic cocci that did not produce gas from glucose, only formed L-lactic acid, and were able to grow at pH 9.6%, in 6.5% NaCl, or with 40% bile, but not below pH 4.5. These isolates were commonly isolated from forage crops, and they were divided into four groups (A, B, C, and D) according to sugar fermentation characteristics. Selected strains of FA 5, FA 27, FA 45, and FA 57 were identified as Enterococcus hirae, E. faecalis, E. casseliflavus, and E. mundtii, respectively, on the basis of DNA-DNA homology, Strains FA 5, FA 27, FA 45, and FA 57 and two strains from commercial inoculants, LC 10 (Lactobacillus casei) and LP 15 (L. plantarum), were used as additives to alfalfa and guinea grass silages. Alphalfa and guinea grass silages inoculated with LC 10, LP 15, FA 5 + LC 10, and FA 5 + LP 15-treatments in alfalfa and guinea grass silages had significantly lower pH values, contents of butyric acid and ammonia nitrogen, gas production, and dry matter losses compared with the control silage after 60 d of fermentation. However, the E. hirae FA 5, E. faecalis FA 27, E. casseliflavus FA 45, and E. mundtii FA 57-inoculated silages gave similar values to the control in both types of silage. The FA 27 + LC 10 and FA 27 + LP 15-inoculated silages did not differ in fermentation quality from LC 10 and LP 15-inoculated silages alone. The results confirmed that Enterococcus species were not able to improve silage quality.

Citing Articles

Ensiling characteristics, digestibility and bacterial community structure of mulberry leaf silage with or without the addition of cellulase, protease, and starch.

Zhao G, Wu H, Li Y, Huang Z, He J, Xie X Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16:1517529.

PMID: 40041016 PMC: 11876043. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1517529.


Dynamics of fermentation quality, bacterial communities, and fermentation weight loss during fermentation of sweet sorghum silage.

Xu H, Wu N, Na N, Ding H, Sun L, Fang Y BMC Microbiol. 2024; 24(1):429.

PMID: 39443910 PMC: 11515734. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-024-03573-1.


Microbiome and response surface methodology analyses reveal as the core bacteria responsible for aerobic spoilage of corn silage () in hot and humid areas.

Bai R, Li H, Chen S, Yuan X, Chen Y, Huang Y Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1473238.

PMID: 39323883 PMC: 11422110. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1473238.


Cleaner anaerobic fermentation and greenhouse gas reduction of crop straw.

Du Z, Nakagawa A, Fang J, Ridwan R, Astuti W, Sarwono K Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(7):e0052024.

PMID: 38832787 PMC: 11218512. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00520-24.


Genotypic and Phenotypic Characteristics of Lactic Acid Bacteria Associated with Forage Plants in the Native Grassland of Western Inner Mongolia and Their Application for Alfalfa Silage Fermentation.

Li W, Li F, Zhang C, Gao J, Tao Y Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 38791612 PMC: 11117391. DOI: 10.3390/ani14101394.