» Articles » PMID: 10575048

Opiate States of Memory: Receptor Mechanisms

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 1999 Nov 27
PMID 10575048
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present studies characterized the receptor mechanisms of morphine-induced states of memory. Morphine (5 mg/kg) produced a state in which rats could learn and retrieve an operant response; retrieval was impaired, however, when the rats were tested in the normal state. Conversely, rats that were trained in the normal state failed to retrieve the response in the morphine state. In either case the mnesic state was dose dependent, commencing at morphine doses as low as 0.8 mg/kg. In rats trained with 5 mg/kg of morphine, retrieval was fully adequate when tested with this same dose but not when tested with either lower or higher doses. Naloxone, but not naltrindole, antagonized the morphine-induced state; heroin and (-)-cyclazocine, but not U50,488H, (+)-cyclazocine and SNC80, produced a state in which retrieval occurred at least partially. Time-effect studies in which injections were made from 0 to 240 min before the sessions indicated that the retrieval in saline-to-morphine and morphine-to-saline conditions occurred along different time courses; a theory of opiate signal transduction suggests that these temporal profiles result from morphine producing two bi-directional mnesic states that may differ as much as the analgesia and hyperalgesia that morphine also induces. It appears that a particular magnitude of mu opiate receptor activation produces a state to which a memory trace can be confined in a highly selective manner. The normal and this particular morphine state are only some of the many mutually inaccessible and molecularly definable states of memory that are likely to exist, thus challenging the unitary concept of an individual organism's memory.

Citing Articles

State-dependent memory and its modulation by different brain areas and neurotransmitters.

Zarrindast M, Khakpai F EXCLI J. 2020; 19:1081-1099.

PMID: 33013265 PMC: 7527511. DOI: 10.17179/excli2020-2612.


Neurobiological correlates of state-dependent context fear.

Meyer M, Corcoran K, Chen H, Gallego S, Li G, Tiruveedhula V Learn Mem. 2017; 24(9):385-391.

PMID: 28814463 PMC: 5580530. DOI: 10.1101/lm.045542.117.


Neurobiological mechanisms of state-dependent learning.

Radulovic J, Jovasevic V, Aa Meyer M Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2017; 45:92-98.

PMID: 28558266 PMC: 5654544. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2017.05.013.


Effects of Estrogen Receptor Modulators on Morphine Induced Sensitization in Mice Memory.

Anoush M, Jani A, Sahebgharani M, Jafari M Iran J Psychiatry. 2016; 10(3):192-9.

PMID: 26877753 PMC: 4749689.


Cocaine induces state-dependent learning of sexual conditioning in male Japanese quail.

Gill K, Rice B, Akins C Physiol Behav. 2014; 138:150-3.

PMID: 25447336 PMC: 4263280. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.10.020.


References
1.
Colpaert F, NIEMEGEERS C, Janssen P . Narcotic cuing and analgesic activity of narcotic analgesics: associative and dissociative characteristics. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978; 57(1):21-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00426952. View

2.
Colpaert F, NIEMEGEERS C, Janssen P . Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning. Psychopharmacologia. 1976; 46(2):169-77. DOI: 10.1007/BF00421388. View

3.
Picker M, Craft R, Negus S, Powell K, Mattox S, Jones S . Intermediate efficacy mu opioids: examination of their morphine-like stimulus effects and response rate-decreasing effects in morphine-tolerant rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992; 263(2):668-81. View

4.
Calderon S, Rothman R, Porreca F, Flippen-Anderson J, McNutt R, Xu H . Probes for narcotic receptor mediated phenomena. 19. Synthesis of (+)-4-[(alpha R)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3- methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide (SNC 80): a highly selective, nonpeptide delta opioid receptor agonist. J Med Chem. 1994; 37(14):2125-8. DOI: 10.1021/jm00040a002. View

5.
Blaney P . Affect and memory: a review. Psychol Bull. 1986; 99(2):229-46. View