» Articles » PMID: 10571089

A Simple Approach to Risk Stratification in Adult Heart Transplantation

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: While there are numerous reports in the literature of risk factors for graft failure after heart transplantation, simple models for risk stratification are lacking. This study describes a simple method for risk stratification in adult heart transplantation that can be applied when the size of a dataset is insufficient for formal regression modelling.

Methods: Multi-centre prospective cohort study. Fourteen risk factors documented in the literature as increasing post transplant graft failure were used to formulate a model. Risk factors included in the model were recipient age >50 years, pre-operative ventilatory support, pre-operative circulatory support, >1 previous sternotomy, pulmonary vascular resistance >2.5 wood units, male with body surface area >2.5 m2, retransplant, ischaemic time >3.5 h, donor age >45 years, donor inotropic support >10 microg/kg per min dopamine, female donor, ratio donor/recipient body surface area <0.7, donor with diabetes and history of donor drug abuse. Four risk groups were defined depending on the number of risk factors present: Low, none; moderate, 1; high, 2 or 3; very high, 4 or more. Graft survival to 30 days was chosen as the primary outcome. The model was tested on 373 adult transplants performed in the UK between April 1995 and December 1996.

Results: Twenty eight transplants were low risk, 82 moderate, 201 high and 62 very high. The 30-day survival (70% CI) for the risk groups was low, 97% (93-100), moderate 95% (92-98), high 87% (84-89) and very high 80% (75-83) (P = 0.02).

Conclusions: This preliminary model enables some stratification of heart transplant procedures according to donor and recipient risk profile. Further work will be directed at refining and validating the model.

Citing Articles

The Utility of the Vasoactive-Inotropic Score and Its Nomogram in Guiding Postoperative Management in Heart Transplant Recipients.

Xiong T, Yim W, Chi J, Wang Y, Lan H, Zhang J Transpl Int. 2024; 37:11354.

PMID: 39119063 PMC: 11306011. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.11354.


Donor heart selection: Evidence-based guidelines for providers.

Copeland H, Knezevic I, Baran D, Rao V, Pham M, Gustafsson F J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022; 42(1):7-29.

PMID: 36357275 PMC: 10284152. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.08.030.


The International Heart Transplant Survival Algorithm (IHTSA): a new model to improve organ sharing and survival.

Nilsson J, Ohlsson M, Hoglund P, Ekmehag B, Koul B, Andersson B PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0118644.

PMID: 25760647 PMC: 4356583. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118644.


External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods.

Royston P, Altman D BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:33.

PMID: 23496923 PMC: 3667097. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-33.


Retrospective cohort study of false alarm rates associated with a series of heart operations: the case for hospital mortality monitoring groups.

Poloniecki J, Sismanidis C, Bland M, Jones P BMJ. 2004; 328(7436):375.

PMID: 14751918 PMC: 341384. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.37956.520567.44.