The Pharmacokinetics of Lamivudine Phosphorylation in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Patients Infected with HIV-1
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To assess the pharmacokinetics of lamivudine phosphorylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients infected with HIV-1.
Design: Single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, cross-over study in 10 asymptomatic, antiretroviral-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients who had a CD4+ lymphocyte count of 200-500 x 10(6)/l and had received combination treatment with lamivudine 150 mg twice a day plus zidovudine 600 mg a day (divided into two or three doses) for > or = 16 weeks prior to study entry.
Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive lamivudine 150 mg twice a day or lamivudine 300 mg twice a day for 14 days, with at least a 48-h washout period between treatments. Serial blood samples were collected over 36 h for determination of lamivudine serum concentrations using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and intracellular phosphate PBMC concentrations using high performance liquid chromatography/radioimmunoassay methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated based on lamivudine and lamivudine anabolite concentration-time data.
Results: Intracellular pharmacokinetic parameters were highly variable between patients (coefficient of variations approximately 50%). The two regimens produced lamivudine-total phosphate (totP) values of a similar magnitude. Although the 300-mg regimen tended to produce higher lamivudine-monophosphate (MP) and -triphosphate (TP) values, differences from values produced by the 150-mg regimen were not statistically significant. As lamivudine diphosphate (DP) was the predominant anabolite, accounting for 50-55% of lamivudine-totP (compared with 30-35% for lamivudine-MP and 15-20% for lamivudine-TP), the conversion of lamivudine-DP to lamivudine-TP can be regarded as the rate-limiting step. The median lamivudine-TP intracellular half-life (t1/2) for the 150-mg and 300-mg regimens did not differ significantly (15.3 and 16.1 h, respectively). Serum lamivudine pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with those observed in previous studies in HIV-1-infected patients. No apparent linear relationships were observed between lamivudine intracellular anabolite and serum data.
Conclusions: The intracellular pharmacokinetics of lamivudine phosphorylation in PBMC from asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients are highly variable and do not differ statistically between the 150- and 300-mg twice a day regimens. The variations in intracellular lamivudine-TP concentrations following these two lamivudine dosage regimens are unlikely to result in differences in clinical effect. This was confirmed by the results of a large phase III study in HIV-1-infected patients which showed no differences in HIV-1 RNA or CD4+ lymphocyte counts between the 150- and 300-mg lamivudine regimens in combination with zidovudine.
Updates on HIV and Kidney Disease.
Cervantes C, Atta M Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2023; 20(2):100-110.
PMID: 36695948 DOI: 10.1007/s11904-023-00645-1.
Waters L, Mehta V, Gogtay J, Boffito M J Virus Erad. 2021; 7(1):100028.
PMID: 33598310 PMC: 7868802. DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2021.100028.
Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate is an Appropriate PrEP Regimen.
Mujugira A, Baeten J, Hodges-Mameletzis I, Haberer J Drugs. 2020; 80(18):1881-1888.
PMID: 33040323 PMC: 7710557. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-020-01419-4.
Boffito M, Waters L, Cahn P, Paredes R, Koteff J, van Wyk J AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2019; 36(1):13-18.
PMID: 31507204 PMC: 6944139. DOI: 10.1089/AID.2019.0171.
Covariate effects and population pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in HIV-infected children.
Piana C, Zhao W, Adkison K, Burger D, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Danhof M Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 77(5):861-72.
PMID: 24118070 PMC: 4004406. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12247.