» Articles » PMID: 10546413

Factors Influencing the Decision About Orthodontic Treatment. A Longitudinal Study Among 11- and 15-year-olds and Their Parents

Overview
Journal J Orofac Orthop
Specialty Dentistry
Date 1999 Nov 5
PMID 10546413
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aims of the study were to evaluate the attitude towards orthodontic treatment among 11-(T1) and 15-year-old children (T2) and their parents, to present the distribution of referral rate and treatment uptake by a treatment need index assessed at T1 and to elucidate factors influencing the decision about orthodontic treatment in the period from T1 to T2. A group of 359 children and their parents answered separate questionnaires at T1, and 293 families responded to a follow-up study 4 years later. For the clinical examination, 224 children participated after exclusion of children in active treatment. The dental study casts were assessed by the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). The mean referral rate was 56%, with a variation from 40% to 71% among different dental clinics. About 44% of the children had completed or were undergoing orthodontic treatment at T2. No significant sex differences among referred and treated children were discovered. Aesthetic motives were the most frequently reported subjective reason for orthodontic care. The untreated group expressed diminishing treatment desire in the follow-up period. The logistic regression analysis selected Dental Health Component (DHC) grades as a strong predictor for treatment uptake, followed by parents' concern and attitude to braces, while the 11-year-olds' own orthodontic concern was less significant. Children in the untreated group with late treatment decisions (T2) were best predicted by Aesthetic Component (AC) changes from T1 to T2. The results indicate that dentists play a key role in determining orthodontic treatment levels. High referral rates secured low risk of denying care to some patients. Treatment decision may be guided by the orthodontist. However, individual variation in attitude and desire influence treatment uptake even among children with great need.

Citing Articles

Effect of Diode Laser and Fluoride Varnish on Microhardness of enamel: An In Vitro Study.

Najjaran H, Safari F, Valizadeh S, Keshvad M, Kharazifard M, Chiniforush N J Lasers Med Sci. 2025; 15:e69.

PMID: 39949473 PMC: 11822237. DOI: 10.34172/jlms.2024.69.


The effects of professional expertise on perceptions of treatment need in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a comparison between orthodontists, general dentists, and lay people in Germany.

Buhling S, Neidhardt S, Sayahpour B, Eslami S, Plein N, Kopp S J Orofac Orthop. 2024; .

PMID: 39495302 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-024-00551-0.


Evaluating smile aesthetic satisfaction and related smile characteristics in dental students.

Nguyen V, Tran N, Nguyen N, Nguyen T J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024; 14(1):92-97.

PMID: 38293571 PMC: 10825610. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.01.002.


Perception of facial and dental asymmetries and their impact on oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents.

Flanze K, Riemekasten S, Hirsch C, Koehne T J Orofac Orthop. 2023; .

PMID: 37640842 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-023-00490-2.


Stability of maxillary anterior teeth during retention and 1 year after removal of retention-an RCT on adolescents retained with two different bonded retainers and a vacuum-formed retainer.

Naraghi S, Ganzer N, Bondemark L, Sonesson M Eur J Orthod. 2023; 45(6):629-636.

PMID: 37119264 PMC: 10687510. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjad020.


References
1.
Bergstrom K, Halling A, Wilde B . Orthodontic care from the patients' perspective: perceptions of 27-year-olds. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20(3):319-29. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/20.3.319. View

2.
Stenvik A, Espeland L, Mathisen A . A longitudinal study on subjective and objective orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod. 1997; 19(1):85-92. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/19.1.85. View

3.
OBrien K, McComb J, Fox N, Wright J . Factors influencing the uptake of orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1996; 23(4):331-4. DOI: 10.1179/bjo.23.4.331. View

4.
Lindgren G . [The need for orthodontic treatment in Ahus and Simrishamn]. Tandlakartidningen. 1986; 78(10):532, 534-6, 538-40. View

5.
Wheeler T, McGorray S, Yurkiewicz L, Keeling S, King G . Orthodontic treatment demand and need in third and fourth grade schoolchildren. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106(1):22-33. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70017-6. View