» Articles » PMID: 10536974

Benchmarking Organ Procurement Organizations: a National Study

Overview
Journal Health Serv Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 1999 Oct 28
PMID 10536974
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: An exploratory examination of the technical efficiency of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) relative to optimal patterns of production in the population of OPOs in the United States.

Data Sources: A composite data set with the OPO as the unit of analysis, constructed from a 1995 national survey of OPOs (n = 64), plus secondary data from the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations and the United Network for Organ Sharing.

Study Design: The study uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the technical efficiency of all OPOs.

Principal Findings: Overall, six of the 22 larger OPOs (27 percent) are classified as inefficient, while 23 of the 42 smaller OPOs (55 percent) are classified as inefficient. Efficient OPOs recover significantly more kidneys and extrarenal organs; have higher operating expenses; and have more referrals, donors, extrarenal transplants, and kidney transplants. The quantities of hospital development personnel and other personnel, and formalization of hospital development activities in both small and large OPOs, do not significantly differ.

Conclusions: Indications that larger OPOs are able to operate more efficiently relative to their peers suggest that smaller OPOs are more likely to benefit from technical assistance. More detailed information on the activities of OPO staff would help pinpoint activities that can increase OPO efficiency and referrals, and potentially improve outcomes for large numbers of patients awaiting transplants.

Citing Articles

Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on the performance of organ transplant services using data envelopment analysis.

Manoel M, Santos S, Amado C Health Care Manag Sci. 2023; 26(2):217-237.

PMID: 37099041 PMC: 10130802. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-023-09637-4.


The Core of Healthcare Efficiency: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review on Frontier Analysis of Hospitals.

Nepomuceno T, Piubello Orsini L, de Carvalho V, Poleto T, Leardini C Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(7).

PMID: 35885842 PMC: 9318001. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071316.


Barriers experienced by organ procurement organizations in implementing the HOPE act and HIV-positive organ donation.

Predmore Z, Doby B, Bozzi D, Durand C, Segev D, Sugarman J AIDS Care. 2021; 34(9):1144-1150.

PMID: 34180726 PMC: 8725194. DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2021.1945999.


An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach.

Ahmadvand S, Pishvaee M Health Care Manag Sci. 2017; 21(4):587-603.

PMID: 28795254 DOI: 10.1007/s10729-017-9414-6.


Measuring health indicators and allocating health resources: a DEA-based approach.

Yang C Health Care Manag Sci. 2016; 20(3):365-378.

PMID: 26842823 DOI: 10.1007/s10729-016-9358-2.


References
1.
Ozcan Y . Physician benchmarking: measuring variation in practice behavior in treatment of otitis media. Health Care Manag Sci. 2000; 1(1):5-17. DOI: 10.1023/a:1019026114859. View

2.
Nunamaker T . Measuring routine nursing service efficiency: a comparison of cost per patient day and data envelopment analysis models. Health Serv Res. 1983; 18(2 Pt 1):183-208. PMC: 1068745. View

3.
Sherman H . Hospital efficiency measurement and evaluation. Empirical test of a new technique. Med Care. 1984; 22(10):922-38. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198410000-00005. View

4.
Denny D . The non-physician coordinator's contribution to the development of an organ procurement program. Transplant Proc. 1985; 17(6 Suppl 4):83-7. View

5.
Huang Y, McLaughlin C . Relative efficiency in rural primary health care: an application of data envelopment analysis. Health Serv Res. 1989; 24(2):143-58. PMC: 1065558. View