» Articles » PMID: 10536746

Ethical Dimensions of Psychiatric Research: a Constructive, Criterion-based Approach to Protocol Preparation. The Research Protocol Ethics Assessment Tool (RePEAT)

Overview
Journal Biol Psychiatry
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 1999 Oct 28
PMID 10536746
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Preparing experimental protocols that are ethically sound, possess scientific merit, and meet institutional and national standards for human subject protections is a key responsibility of psychiatric investigators. This task has become increasingly complex due to developments in biomedical science, bioethics, and society at large. Practical and constructive approaches to help investigators in their efforts to create protocols that are ethically acceptable have nevertheless received little attention. To better address this gap, the Research Protocol Ethics Assessment Tool (RePEAT) was developed as an educational instrument to help assure that ethically important elements, including scientific design features, are explicitly addressed by investigators in their work with protocols involving human participants. The RePEAT is a brief evaluative checklist that reflects rigorous ethical standards, particularly with respect to criteria for studies that may involve individuals with compromised decisional abilities. For this reason, it may be especially beneficial as a self-assessment tool for investigators and protocol reviewers in psychiatry. To stimulate education and dialogue, this report presents the RePEAT and outlines its content, format, use, and limitations.

Citing Articles

Ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke.

Ferrarello F, Viligiardi M, Bari M Arch Physiother. 2018; 8:8.

PMID: 29992047 PMC: 5989458. DOI: 10.1186/s40945-018-0049-9.


Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.

Reijers W, Wright D, Brey P, Weber K, Rodrigues R, OSullivan D Sci Eng Ethics. 2017; 24(5):1437-1481.

PMID: 28900898 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9961-8.


Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees.

Li R, Wacholtz M, Barnes M, Boggs L, Callery-DAmico S, Davis A J Med Ethics. 2016; 42(4):229-34.

PMID: 26811365 PMC: 4819642. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102540.


Views of people with schizophrenia regarding aspects of research: study size and funding sources.

Roberts L, Warner T, Hammond K, Hoop J Schizophr Bull. 2005; 32(1):107-15.

PMID: 16254065 PMC: 2632193. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbj022.


A time of promise, a time of promises: ethical issues in advancing psychopharmacological research.

Roberts L, Krystal J Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003; 171(1):1-5.

PMID: 14615879 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1704-7.