» Articles » PMID: 10535953

Exploring the Origins of Topological Frustration: Design of a Minimally Frustrated Model of Fragment B of Protein A

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 1999 Oct 27
PMID 10535953
Citations 88
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Topological frustration in an energetically unfrustrated off-lattice model of the helical protein fragment B of protein A from Staphylococcus aureus was investigated. This G-type model exhibited thermodynamic and kinetic signatures of a well-designed two-state folder with concurrent collapse and folding transitions and single exponential kinetics at the transition temperature. Topological frustration is determined in the absence of energetic frustration by the distribution of Fersht phi values. Topologically unfrustrated systems present a unimodal distribution sharply peaked at intermediate phi, whereas highly frustrated systems display a bimodal distribution peaked at low and high phi values. The distribution of phi values in protein A was determined both thermodynamically and kinetically. Both methods yielded a unimodal distribution centered at phi = 0.3 with tails extending to low and high phi values, indicating the presence of a small amount of topological frustration. The contacts with high phi values were located in the turn regions between helices I and II and II and III, intimating that these hairpins are in large part required in the transition state. Our results are in good agreement with all-atom simulations of protein A, as well as lattice simulations of a three- letter code 27-mer (which can be compared with a 60-residue helical protein). The relatively broad unimodal distribution of phi values obtained from the all-atom simulations and that from the minimalist model for the same native fold suggest that the structure of the transition state ensemble is determined mostly by the protein topology and not energetic frustration.

Citing Articles

Toward Accurate Simulation of Coupling between Protein Secondary Structure and Phase Separation.

Zhang Y, Li S, Gong X, Chen J J Am Chem Soc. 2023; 146(1):342-357.

PMID: 38112495 PMC: 10842759. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c09195.


Study of fusion peptide release for the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.

Yu J, Zhang Z, Yang H, Liu C, Lu W RSC Adv. 2023; 13(25):16970-16983.

PMID: 37288377 PMC: 10242618. DOI: 10.1039/d3ra01764h.


Denatured State Conformational Biases in Three-Helix Bundles Containing Divergent Sequences Localize near Turns and Helix Capping Residues.

Leavens M, Spang L, Cherney M, Bowler B Biochemistry. 2021; 60(41):3071-3085.

PMID: 34606713 PMC: 8751257. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00400.


Sterically confined rearrangements of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein control cell invasion.

Dodero-Rojas E, Onuchic J, Whitford P Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 34463614 PMC: 8456623. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.70362.


Energy landscape remodeling mechanism of Hsp70-chaperone-accelerated protein folding.

Lu J, Zhang X, Wu Y, Sheng Y, Li W, Wang W Biophys J. 2021; 120(10):1971-1983.

PMID: 33745889 PMC: 8204389. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.03.013.


References
1.
Frauenfelder H, Sligar S, Wolynes P . The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science. 1991; 254(5038):1598-603. DOI: 10.1126/science.1749933. View

2.
Sheinerman F, Brooks 3rd C . Molecular picture of folding of a small alpha/beta protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(4):1562-7. PMC: 19093. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1562. View

3.
Gutin A, Abkevich V, Shakhnovich E . A protein engineering analysis of the transition state for protein folding: simulation in the lattice model. Fold Des. 1998; 3(3):183-94. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00026-1. View

4.
Bottomley S, Popplewell A, Scawen M, Wan T, Sutton B, Gore M . The stability and unfolding of an IgG binding protein based upon the B domain of protein A from Staphylococcus aureus probed by tryptophan substitution and fluorescence spectroscopy. Protein Eng. 1994; 7(12):1463-70. DOI: 10.1093/protein/7.12.1463. View

5.
Karplus M, Sali A . Theoretical studies of protein folding and unfolding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1995; 5(1):58-73. DOI: 10.1016/0959-440x(95)80010-x. View