Irregularity of the Ventricular Rhythm During Atrial Fibrillation: Effect of Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway Ablation

Overview

Journal Clin Cardiol

Specialty Cardiology & Vascular Diseases

Date 1999 Oct 20

PMID 10526693

Authors

B Frey

G Kreiner

B Liebisch

S Sauermann

H D Gossinger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The contribution of dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway physiology to the irregularity of the ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation has not been clarified.

Hypothesis: This study was performed to assess the effects of slow AV nodal pathway ablation on the irregularity of the ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation.

Methods: Irregularity of the ventricular rhythm was quantified using analysis of heart rate variability. In 20 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, absolute heart rate variability during atrial fibrillation was quantified before and after slow AV nodal pathway ablation by the standard deviation of all NN intervals (SDNN). Relative heart rate variability was determined by computing the coefficient of variation, SDNN normalized for the standard deviation of the mean ventricular cycle length (MVCL-AF).

Results: The slope of the regression between MVCL-AF and SDNN was significantly more gradual after slow pathway ablation (slope 0.39 vs. 0.23, p < 0.001). Coefficient of variation increased in 12 patients with heart rates > 120 beats/min at baseline (18.6 +/- 3.9 vs. 22.1 +/- 2.7% MVCL-AF, p < 0.05), but decreased in 8 patients with heart rates < 120 beats/min at baseline (25.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 22.2 +/- 2.2% MVCL-AF, p = 0.05). Furthermore, coefficient of variation correlated with MVCL-AF only at baseline (slope 0.034, r = 0.66), but no relation was found after slow pathway ablation (slope 0, r = 0).

Conclusions: Slow AV nodal pathway ablation alters the relation between absolute heart rate variability and mean ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation and eliminates cycle length dependency of relative heart rate variability. These data indicate that dual AV nodal pathway physiology contributes to the irregularity of the ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation.

References

Lindsay B, Chung M, Gamache M, Luke R, Schechtman K, Osborn J . Therapeutic end points for the treatment of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia by catheter-guided radiofrequency current. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22(3):733-40. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90184-3. View

LANGENDORF R, Pick A . VENTRICULAR RESPONSE IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. ROLE OF CONCEALED CONDUCTION IN THE AV JUNCTION. Circulation. 1965; 32:69-75. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.32.1.69. View

Friesen G, Jannett T, Jadallah M, Yates S, Quint S, Nagle H . A comparison of the noise sensitivity of nine QRS detection algorithms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990; 37(1):85-98. DOI: 10.1109/10.43620. View

Daoud E, Weiss R, Bahu M, Knight B, Bogun F, Goyal R . Effect of an irregular ventricular rhythm on cardiac output. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78(12):1433-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89297-1. View

Natale A, Klein G, Yee R, Thakur R . Shortening of fast pathway refractoriness after slow pathway ablation. Effects of autonomic blockade. Circulation. 1994; 89(3):1103-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.89.3.1103. View

PIDGEON J, Lab M, Seed A, Elzinga G, Papadoyannis D, NOBLE M . The contractile state of cat and dog heart in relation to the interval between beats. Circ Res. 1980; 47(4):559-67. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.47.4.559. View

Gibson D, Broder G, Sowton E . Effect of varying pulse interval in atrial fibrillation on left ventricular function in man. Br Heart J. 1971; 33(3):388-93. PMC: 458423. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.33.3.388. View

Frey B, Heinz G, Kreiner G, Schmidinger H, Weber H, Gossinger H . Increased heart rate variability after radiofrequency ablation. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 71(16):1460-1. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90614-i. View

Jackman W, Beckman K, McClelland J, Wang X, Friday K, Roman C . Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327(5):313-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199207303270504. View

10.

Jackman W, Wang X, Friday K, Roman C, Moulton K, Beckman K . Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) by radiofrequency current. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324(23):1605-11. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199106063242301. View

11.

Zhang X, Fisher J, Kim S, Matos J, Waspe L, JOHNSON C . Comparison of ramp and stepwise incremental pacing in assessment of antegrade and retrograde conduction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1986; 9(1 Pt 1):42-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1986.tb05360.x. View

12.

Cossu S, Rothman S, Chmielewski I, HSIA H, Vogel R, Miller J . The effects of isoproterenol on the cardiac conduction system: site-specific dose dependence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997; 8(8):847-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00845.x. View

13.

Escudero E, Iveli C, Moreyra A, Lorente H, Cingolani H . The pulse in patients with atrial fibrillation: its irregularity and inequality. Eur J Cardiol. 1976; 4(1):31-8. View

14.

Chorro F, Kirchhof C, Brugada J, Allessie M . Ventricular response during irregular atrial pacing and atrial fibrillation. Am J Physiol. 1990; 259(4 Pt 2):H1015-21. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1990.259.4.H1015. View

15.

Kocovic D, Harada T, Shea J, Soroff D, Friedman P . Alterations of heart rate and of heart rate variability after radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Delineation of parasympathetic pathways in the human heart. Circulation. 1993; 88(4 Pt 1):1671-81. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.88.4.1671. View

16.

BIGGER Jr J, Fleiss J, Steinman R, Rolnitzky L, Kleiger R, Rottman J . Correlations among time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability two weeks after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 69(9):891-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90788-z. View

17.

. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996; 17(3):354-81. View

18.

Janse M . Influence of the direction of the atrial wave front on A-V nodal transmission in isolated hearts of rabbits. Circ Res. 1969; 25(4):439-49. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.25.4.439. View

19.

Merri M, Farden D, Mottley J, Titlebaum E . Sampling frequency of the electrocardiogram for spectral analysis of the heart rate variability. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990; 37(1):99-106. DOI: 10.1109/10.43621. View

20.

Lau C, Leung W, Wong C, Cheng C . Haemodynamics of induced atrial fibrillation: a comparative assessment with sinus rhythm, atrial and ventricular pacing. Eur Heart J. 1990; 11(3):219-24. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059687. View