» Articles » PMID: 10506771

Predictors of Complications and Learning Curve Using the Angio-Seal Closure Device Following Interventional and Diagnostic Catheterization

Overview
Date 1999 Oct 3
PMID 10506771
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted to determine the frequency and nature of groin complications when the Angio-Seal device was used on 252 occasions by one operator immediately following interventional (66%) and diagnostic (34%) procedures. Sixty-nine percent of the 238 successfully deployed cases received ticlopidine or clopidogrel, 16% received abciximab, and 15% received heparin postprocedure. Complications included vascular surgery for collagen plug perforation into the femoral artery (0.8%), failure to deploy (5.6%), pseudoaneurysm (0.4%), brisk, visible bleeding (9%), persistent ooze (14%), hematoma > 6 cm (0.8%), hematoma </= 6 cm (2.4%), and ecchymosis > 1 cm(2) (10%). Multivariate analysis identified diagnostic cases (6 Fr sheaths) to be associated with a reduced risk of complications [odds ratio (OR) 0.1] while interventional procedures (8 Fr sheaths), postprocedure heparin, and body mass index (BMI) < 28 (OR 10.1, 3.2, and 2.8, respectively) were associated with increased risk. Gender, age, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and abciximab were not independent predictors of complications. A learning curve for device deployment was observed in the first 50 cases (14% nondeployment vs. 3.5% for the subsequent 202 procedures, P = 0.009) and failure to deploy was independent of sheath size used. Angio-Seal can be used with reasonable safety and efficacy immediately after diagnostic and interventional procedures. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:162-166, 1999.

Citing Articles

Real Data Applications of Learning Curves In Cardiac Devices and Procedures.

Govindarajulu U, Goldfarb D, Resnic F J Med Stat Inform. 2024; 6.

PMID: 39234446 PMC: 11373672. DOI: 10.7243/2053-7662-6-2.


Best practices for vascular arterial access and closure: a contemporary guide for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Eltelbany M, Fabbri M, Batchelor W, Cilia L, DuCoffe A, Endicott K Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1349480.

PMID: 38550517 PMC: 10976582. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1349480.


Risk Factors for Puncture Site Complications Using the Angio-Seal Closure Device in Endovascular Therapy: A Single-center Analysis.

Yokoyama T, Hamasuna R, Ohta H, Takeshima H J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2023; 14(2):48-55.

PMID: 37502456 PMC: 10370798. DOI: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0060.


Outcomes of the roll-in cohort of the Amulet IDE trial of left atrial appendage occlusion.

Lakkireddy D, Thaler D, Ellis C, Swarup V, Sondergaard L, Carroll J Heart Rhythm O2. 2022; 3(5):493-500.

PMID: 36340489 PMC: 9626886. DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.07.004.


Learning curve estimation in medical devices and procedures: hierarchical modeling.

Govindarajulu U, Stillo M, Goldfarb D, Matheny M, Resnic F Stat Med. 2017; 36(17):2764-2785.

PMID: 28470678 PMC: 6463283. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7309.