» Articles » PMID: 10494417

Cecal Carriage of Clostridium Perfringens in Broiler Chickens Given Mucosal Starter Culture

Overview
Journal Avian Dis
Date 1999 Sep 24
PMID 10494417
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Day-of-hatch broiler chicks housed in isolation units were each given, by oral gavage, 0.1 ml of Mucosal Starter Culture (MSC) or saline control. Each of the treated and control chicks was subsequently given a composite culture of three strains of bacitracin-resistant Clostridium perfringens (Cp) previously isolated from chickens with symptoms of necrotic enteritis. Some chicks were maintained on a corn-based diet provided ad libitum. Others were given the feed supplemented with 50% rye (a predisposing factor for necrotic enteritis). At 7, 14, and 21 days after receiving Cp, chicks were euthanatized, and cecal contents were diluted and plated on selective agar containing bacitracin. For chicks on corn feed, Cp numbers were similar in control birds and birds given MSC in three of four trials. In two of the trials that demonstrated no effect of MSC on Cp numbers, enterotoxin presence was determined. The number of birds with detectable Cp enterotoxin in their small intestine and the mean toxin levels were lower in the MSC-treated birds. In a fourth trial with birds on corn-based feed, mean Cp numbers and the number of Cp-positive birds were lower in the MSC-treated birds. For the two trials involving chickens on rye-supplemented feed, Cp numbers and the percentage of Cp-positive birds were significantly reduced in MSC-treated birds compared with control birds. Enterotoxin in birds receiving the 50% rye diet was at low levels or not detected in control and MSC-treated birds. Results suggest that MSC may reduce intestinal proliferation of Cp, a causative agent of necrotic enteritis in poultry and of foodborne disease in humans.

Citing Articles

as Foodborne Pathogen in Broiler Production: Pathophysiology and Potential Strategies for Controlling Necrotic Enteritis.

Villagran-de la Mora Z, Macias-Rodriguez M, Arratia-Quijada J, Gonzalez-Torres Y, Nuno K, Villarruel-Lopez A Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(9).

PMID: 32972009 PMC: 7552638. DOI: 10.3390/ani10091718.


EMA and EFSA Joint Scientific Opinion on measures to reduce the need to use antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry in the European Union, and the resulting impacts on food safety (RONAFA).

Murphy D, Ricci A, Auce Z, Beechinor J, Bergendahl H, Breathnach R EFSA J. 2020; 15(1):e04666.

PMID: 32625259 PMC: 7010070. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4666.


Environmental Impact on Differential Composition of Gut Microbiota in Indoor Chickens in Commercial Production and Outdoor, Backyard Chickens.

Seidlerova Z, Kubasova T, Faldynova M, Crhanova M, Karasova D, Babak V Microorganisms. 2020; 8(5).

PMID: 32443788 PMC: 7285315. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8050767.


The Microbial Pecking Order: Utilization of Intestinal Microbiota for Poultry Health.

Maki J, Klima C, Sylte M, Looft T Microorganisms. 2019; 7(10).

PMID: 31547217 PMC: 6843665. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7100376.


Towards the control of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens with in-feed antibiotics phasing-out worldwide.

MSadeq S, Wu S, Swick R, Choct M Anim Nutr. 2018; 1(1):1-11.

PMID: 29766984 PMC: 5884463. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.02.004.