» Articles » PMID: 10493723

Signal Transfer in Passive Dendrites with Nonuniform Membrane Conductance

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 1999 Sep 24
PMID 10493723
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years it became clear that dendrites possess a host of ion channels that may be distributed nonuniformly over their membrane surface. In cortical pyramids, for example, it was demonstrated that the resting membrane conductance G(m)(x) is higher (the membrane is "leakier") at distal dendritic regions than at more proximal sites. How does this spatial nonuniformity in G(m)(x) affect the input-output function of the neuron? The present study aims at providing basic insights into this question. To this end, we have analytically studied the fundamental effects of membrane non-uniformity in passive cable structures. Keeping the total membrane conductance over a given modeled structure fixed (i.e., a constant number of passive ion channels), the classical case of cables with uniform membrane conductance is contrasted with various nonuniform cases with the following general conclusions. (1) For cylindrical cables with "sealed ends," monotonic increase in G(m)(x) improves voltage transfer from the input location to the soma. The steeper the G(m)(x), the larger the improvement. (2) This effect is further enhanced when the stimulation is distal and consists of a synaptic input rather than a current source. (3) Any nonuniformity in G(m)(x) decreases the electrotonic length, L, of the cylinder. (4) The system time constant tau(0) is larger in the nonuniform case than in the corresponding uniform case. (5) When voltage transients relax with tau(0), the dendritic tree is not isopotential in the nonuniform case, at variance with the uniform case. The effect of membrane nonuniformity on signal transfer in reconstructed dendritic trees and on the I/f relation of the neuron is also considered, and experimental methods for assessing membrane nonuniformity in dendrites are discussed.

Citing Articles

GABA Receptor-Mediated Regulation of Dendro-Somatic Synergy in Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons.

Schulz J, Kay J, Bischofberger J, Larkum M Front Cell Neurosci. 2021; 15:718413.

PMID: 34512268 PMC: 8425515. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.718413.


A Single Differential Equation Description of Membrane Properties Underlying the Action Potential and the Axon Electric Field.

Melendy R J Electr Bioimpedance. 2021; 9(1):106-114.

PMID: 33584926 PMC: 7852009. DOI: 10.2478/joeb-2018-0015.


Efficient Low-Pass Dendro-Somatic Coupling in the Apical Dendrite of Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex.

Marti Mengual U, Wybo W, Spierenburg L, Santello M, Senn W, Nevian T J Neurosci. 2020; 40(46):8799-8815.

PMID: 33046549 PMC: 7659461. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3028-19.2020.


Linking demyelination to compound action potential dispersion with a spike-diffuse-spike approach.

Naud R, Longtin A J Math Neurosci. 2019; 9(1):3.

PMID: 31147800 PMC: 6542900. DOI: 10.1186/s13408-019-0071-6.


h-Type Membrane Current Shapes the Local Field Potential from Populations of Pyramidal Neurons.

Ness T, Remme M, Einevoll G J Neurosci. 2018; 38(26):6011-6024.

PMID: 29875266 PMC: 6595970. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3278-17.2018.


References
1.
Schierwagen A . A non-uniform equivalent cable model of membrane voltage changes in a passive dendritic tree. J Theor Biol. 1989; 141(2):159-79. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(89)80015-3. View

2.
Stuart G, Sakmann B . Amplification of EPSPs by axosomatic sodium channels in neocortical pyramidal neurons. Neuron. 1995; 15(5):1065-76. DOI: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90095-0. View

3.
Chen W, Midtgaard J, Shepherd G . Forward and backward propagation of dendritic impulses and their synaptic control in mitral cells. Science. 1997; 278(5337):463-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.278.5337.463. View

4.
Durand D . The somatic shunt cable model for neurons. Biophys J. 1984; 46(5):645-53. PMC: 1435058. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84063-1. View

5.
RALL W . Theory of physiological properties of dendrites. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1962; 96:1071-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb54120.x. View