» Articles » PMID: 10481122

Multivariate Analysis of Factors Predicting Outcome After Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1999 Sep 11
PMID 10481122
Citations 103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has been applied with increasing frequency in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The aim of this study was to determine the variables that predict outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. A multivariate analysis was performed on data from 199 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Variables included age, sex, body mass index, primary symptoms, clinical response to acid suppression therapy, erosive esophagitis, 24-hour esophageal pH score, and the percentage of time the esophageal pH was less than 4 on 24-hour pH monitoring, lower esophageal sphincter competence, status of the esophageal body motility, hiatal hernia, carditis, intestinal metaplasia of cardiac epithelium limited to the gastroesophageal junction, and Barrett's esophagus of any length. Clinical outcome was obtained from all patients at a median follow-up of 15 months (range 6 to 74 months) after surgery. One hundred seventy-three patients had an excellent or good outcome (87%) and 26 had a fair or poor outcome. Three factors were significantly predictive of a successful outcome: an abnormal 24-hour pH score (odds ratio = 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1. 9-15.3), a typical primary symptom (odds ratio = 5.1; 95% CI = 1. 9-13.6), and a clinical response to acid suppression therapy (odds ratio = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.7). We conclude that 24-hour pH monitoring provides the strongest outcome predictor of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and that outcome is based more on the correct identification of the disease than on its severity.

Citing Articles

Update Motility Disorders: Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease - Diagnostic and Conservative Approach.

Fox M Visc Med. 2024; 40(6):299-309.

PMID: 39664098 PMC: 11631173. DOI: 10.1159/000541358.


Fundoplication: Old Concept for Novel Challenges?.

Bonavina L, Bona D, Aiolfi A, Shabat G, Annese V, Galassi L Visc Med. 2024; 40(5):236-241.

PMID: 39398391 PMC: 11466449. DOI: 10.1159/000536566.


Improving treatment of people with gastro-esophageal reflux disease refractory to proton pump inhibitors.

Labenz J, Schoppmann S Commun Med (Lond). 2024; 4(1):200.

PMID: 39397153 PMC: 11471847. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00632-6.


Risk factors associated with functional esophageal disorders (FED) versus gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Sachar M, Mautner Wizentier M, Risner E, Asmail H, Omara M, Chablaney S Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(5):2842-2849.

PMID: 38528263 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10714-0.


Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Diagnosis and Management.

Davis T, Gyawali C J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024; 30(1):17-28.

PMID: 38173155 PMC: 10774805. DOI: 10.5056/jnm23145.


References
1.
Pellegrini C, DeMeester T, Johnson L, SKINNER D . Gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary aspiration: incidence, functional abnormality, and results of surgical therapy. Surgery. 1979; 86(1):110-9. View

2.
Rakic S, Stein H, DeMeester T, Hinder R . Role of esophageal body function in gastroesophageal reflux disease: implications for surgical management. J Am Coll Surg. 1997; 185(4):380-7. View

3.
Stein H, Barlow A, DeMeester T, Hinder R . Complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Role of the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal acid and acid/alkaline exposure, and duodenogastric reflux. Ann Surg. 1992; 216(1):35-43. PMC: 1242544. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199207000-00006. View

4.
Hunter J, Trus T, Branum G, Waring J, Wood W . A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg. 1996; 223(6):673-85; discussion 685-7. PMC: 1235211. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199606000-00006. View

5.
Tefera L, Fein M, Ritter M, Bremner C, Crookes P, Peters J . Can the combination of symptoms and endoscopy confirm the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease?. Am Surg. 1997; 63(10):933-6. View