» Articles » PMID: 10474107

Effect of Variation in Tooth Morphology and Bracket Position on First and Third Order Correction with Preadjusted Appliances

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 1999 Sep 4
PMID 10474107
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Major effort is put into the design of brackets to accomplish an optimal completion of orthodontic treatment with respect to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd order corrections. Because such brackets are standardized, the intraindividual variation of the teeth is not taken into consideration. The influence of vertical bracket displacement on 1st and 3rd order corrections was studied on the plaster models, including all teeth from central incisors to first molars, of 28 young persons. The facial contours were evaluated at the mesial, central, and the distal aspect of the bracket. The contours were calculated with the formula of a parabola, and the fit was found sufficient. Intertooth variation was extreme, the biggest curvature was found among the first mandibular molars. The variation was also marked between corresponding teeth. It can be concluded that the intraindividual variation in tooth morphology is larger than the variation between the different types of preadjusted appliances. Thus, if the straight wire approach should be followed, the bracket would have to be custom made. All the calculations were made with the precondition that full size wires were used. If this is not the case, the discussion concerning individual prescription is only of limited importance.

Citing Articles

Anatomical Facial Characteristics of Teeth and Tooth Analysis.

de Bruin S, Ishwarkumar-Govender S, Pillay P Dent J (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39851578 PMC: 11764234. DOI: 10.3390/dj13010002.


The Mechanical and Clinical Properties of Customized Orthodontic Bracket Systems-A Comprehensive Review.

Elabed I, Zheng Z, Zhang Y, Chung C, Li C J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(10).

PMID: 39452597 PMC: 11508451. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15100299.


Clinical effectiveness of customized versus noncustomized orthodontic appliances: A systematic review.

Yassir Y, Sofar M, McIntyre G, Bearn D J Orthod Sci. 2024; 13:26.

PMID: 39450227 PMC: 11500738. DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_46_24.


Direct versus fully digital indirect bracket bonding: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial on accuracy.

Hoekstra-van Hout P, Hoekstra J, Bruggink R, Bronkhorst E, Ongkosuwito E Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(10):557.

PMID: 39340567 PMC: 11438723. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05950-6.


A Hypothesis Testing of Archwire Rounding for the Efficacy of Torque Springs in Orthodontics: A Finite Element Study.

Balisany B, Chawshli O, Omer Z Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e57292.

PMID: 38559510 PMC: 10981576. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57292.