» Articles » PMID: 10471279

Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Ntg1p and Ntg2p: Broad Specificity N-glycosylases for the Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage in the Nucleus and Mitochondria

Overview
Journal Biochemistry
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 1999 Sep 2
PMID 10471279
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae possesses two functional homologues (Ntg1p and Ntg2p) of the Escherichia coli endonuclease III protein, a DNA base excision repair N-glycosylase with a broad substrate specificity directed primarily against oxidatively damaged pyrimidines. The substrate specificities of Ntg1p and Ntg2p are similar but not identical, and differences in their amino acid sequences as well as inducibility by DNA damaging agents suggest that the two proteins may have different biological roles and subcellular locations. Experiments performed on oligonucleotides containing a variety of oxidative base damages indicated that dihydrothymine, urea, and uracil glycol are substrates for Ntg1p and Ntg2p, although dihydrothymine was a poor substrate for Ntg2p. Vectors encoding Ntg1p-green fluorescent protein (GFP) and Ntg2p-GFP fusions under the control of their respective endogenous promoters were utilized to observe the subcellular targeting of Ntg1p and Ntg2p in S. cerevisiae. Fluorescence microscopy of pNTG1-GFP and pNTG2-GFP transformants revealed that Ntg1p localizes primarily to the mitochondria with some nuclear localization, whereas Ntg2p localizes exclusively to the nucleus. In addition, the subcellular location of Ntg1p and Ntg2p confers differential sensitivities to the alkylating agent MMS. These results expand the known substrate specificities of Ntg1p and Ntg2p, indicating that their base damage recognition ranges show distinct differences and that these proteins mediate different roles in the repair of DNA base damage in the nucleus and mitochondria of yeast.

Citing Articles

Analysis of nucleotide insertion opposite urea and translesion synthesis across urea by DNA polymerases.

Kawada T, Kino K, Tokorodani K, Anabuki R, Morikawa M, Kobayashi T Genes Environ. 2022; 44(1):7.

PMID: 35168664 PMC: 8845263. DOI: 10.1186/s41021-022-00236-3.


DNA Base Excision Repair in Plants: An Unfolding Story With Familiar and Novel Characters.

Roldan-Arjona T, Ariza R, Cordoba-Canero D Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:1055.

PMID: 31543887 PMC: 6728418. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01055.


Oxidative Stress-Mediated Overexpression of Uracil DNA Glycosylase in Confers Tolerance against Antileishmanial Drugs.

Mishra A, Khan M, Jha P, Kumar A, Das S, Das P Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018; 2018:4074357.

PMID: 29636843 PMC: 5845521. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4074357.


Repair of oxidatively induced DNA damage by DNA glycosylases: Mechanisms of action, substrate specificities and excision kinetics.

Dizdaroglu M, Coskun E, Jaruga P Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2017; 771:99-127.

PMID: 28342455 PMC: 7451025. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2017.02.001.


Genome maintenance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of SUMO and SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases.

Jalal D, Chalissery J, Hassan A Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(5):2242-2261.

PMID: 28115630 PMC: 5389695. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1369.