» Articles » PMID: 10456705

Dissemination of Melanoma Cells Within Electrocautery Plume

Overview
Journal Am J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1999 Aug 24
PMID 10456705
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The observed occurrence of port site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for malignant disease has stimulated interest in the dissemination of tumor cells during surgery. Study of electrocautery smoke has revealed the presence of large particles and viable viruses. The purpose of this study was to determine if viable malignant cells are present in suspension within the electrocautery plume.

Methods: Pellets of B16-F0 mouse melanoma cells were cauterized and the plume collected into culture medium. In part 1 of this study, the trypan blue assay was used to assess cell viability immediately after collection and 7 days later. A cautery current of 30 W was applied for 5 minutes. In part 2, the tetrazolium (MTT) viability assay was used to assess cell viability after cauterization of tumor pellets at 10, 20, and 30 W for 5 seconds.

Results: Although intact melanoma cells were identified with the trypan blue assay immediately after plume collection, no viable cells were seen at 7 days using this assay. In part 2, viable melanoma cells were present in the culture wells at 7 days. Lower fulguration currents appeared to yield higher cell counts: 2,250 cells/well at 10 W, 2,100 cells/well at 20 W, and 1,800 cells/well at 30 W.

Conclusions: Results of this study confirm that application of electrocautery to a pellet of melanoma cells releases these cells into the plume. These cells are viable and may be grown in culture. This release of malignant cells may explain the appearance of port metastases at sites that are remote from the surgical dissection or that were never in direct contact with the tumor.

Citing Articles

Knowledge mapping of surgical smoke from 2003 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis.

Li C, Geng M, Li S, Li X, Li H, Yuan H Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(3):1465-1483.

PMID: 38228836 PMC: 10881617. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10641-6.


Impact of Surgical Smoke on the Surgical Team and Operating Room Nurses and Its Reduction Strategies: A Systematic Review.

Merajikhah A, Imani B, Khazaei S, Bouraghi H Iran J Public Health. 2022; 51(1):27-36.

PMID: 35223623 PMC: 8837875. DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v51i1.8289.


Association of Occupational Exposure to Inhaled Agents in Operating Rooms With Incidence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among US Female Nurses.

Xie W, Dumas O, Varraso R, Boggs K, Camargo Jr C, Stokes A JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(9):e2125749.

PMID: 34542617 PMC: 8453320. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25749.


Laparoscopic versus open surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study on short-term and long-term outcomes.

Ma D, Wang W, Wang J, Zhang T, Jiang Z, Du G Surg Endosc. 2021; 36(6):3721-3731.

PMID: 34398281 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08686-6.


A knowledge gap unmasked: viral transmission in surgical smoke: a systematic review.

Robertson-More C, Wu T Surg Endosc. 2021; 35(6):2428-2439.

PMID: 33495880 PMC: 7833447. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08261-5.