» Articles » PMID: 10451784

Relationships Between Exposure to Saquinavir Monotherapy and Antiviral Response in HIV-positive Patients

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1999 Aug 19
PMID 10451784
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to confirm the most appropriate dosage of a new soft gelatin capsule (SGC) formulation of the HIV protease inhibitor saquinavir by investigating the relationships between systemic (plasma) exposure to saquinavir and plasma HIV RNA and CD4+ cell counts using empirical mathematical modelling.

Design And Setting: A randomised, non-blind, multicentre, dose-ranging 8-week study of monotherapy with 400, 800 or 1200 mg of saquinavir-SGC or 600 mg of the hard gelatin capsule (HGC) formulation, both administered 3 times daily, was carried out in protease inhibitor-naive, HIV-positive adults. Two surrogate markers of response, plasma HIV RNA level and CD4+ cell count, were fitted to 2 measures of systemic drug exposure, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and trough plasma concentration (Cmin), using 6 exposure-response models of progressively increasing complexity. Akaike and Schwarz model selection criteria were applied to determine the most effective pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship.

Results: A total of 88 patients were randomised; pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were available for 84 patients. In terms of plasma HIV RNA, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships were best described by a 2-parameter maximum effect (Emax) model, which predicted a typical maximum reduction in viral load of 1.94 log10 copies/ml [coefficient of variation (CV) 12%], with a half-maximal antiviral response occurring at a Cmin of 50 micrograms/L (CV 40%). Saquinavir-SGC 1200 mg administered 3 times daily produced a median AUC to 24 hours (AUC24) of approximately 20,000 micrograms/L.h, corresponding to 85% of the maximum achievable antiviral effect as defined by the model. None of the models yielded a satisfactory fit for CD4+ cell count.

Conclusion: Empirical mathematical modelling confirmed that, when administered 3 times daily, the optimum dose of saquinavir-SGC is 1200 mg, corresponding to 3600 mg/day.

Citing Articles

Effect of a modified saquinavir/ritonavir dosing regimen with lower dose lead-in phase on QTc interval, pharmacokinetics, antiviral activity and safety in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients.

Boffito M, Jackson A, Pozniak A, Giraudon M, Kulkarni R, Abelardo M Drugs R D. 2015; 15(1):141-53.

PMID: 25742730 PMC: 4359187. DOI: 10.1007/s40268-015-0087-7.


Integrated population pharmacokinetic/viral dynamic modelling of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 treatment-naïve patients.

Wang K, DArgenio D, Acosta E, Sheth A, Delille C, Lennox J Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013; 53(4):361-71.

PMID: 24311282 PMC: 3962720. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-013-0122-1.


Novel method to assess antiretroviral target trough concentrations using in vitro susceptibility data.

Acosta E, Limoli K, Trinh L, Parkin N, King J, Weidler J Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56(11):5938-45.

PMID: 22964257 PMC: 3486606. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00691-12.


An example of optimal phase II design for exposure response modelling.

Maloney A, Schaddelee M, Freijer J, Krauwinkel W, van Gelderen M, Jacqmin P J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2010; 37(5):475-91.

PMID: 20872056 DOI: 10.1007/s10928-010-9168-y.


Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic of once-daily boosted saquinavir (1500/100 mg) together with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in real life: a multicentre prospective study.

Lopez-Cortes L, Viciana P, Ruiz-Valderas R, Pasquau J, Ruiz J, Lozano F AIDS Res Ther. 2010; 7:5.

PMID: 20236544 PMC: 2847537. DOI: 10.1186/1742-6405-7-5.


References
1.
Lalezari J . Selecting the optimum dose for a new soft gelatin capsule formulation of saquinavir. NV15107 Study Group. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998; 19(2):195-7. DOI: 10.1097/00042560-199810010-00015. View

2.
Collier A, Coombs R, Schoenfeld D, Bassett R, Timpone J, Baruch A . Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection with saquinavir, zidovudine, and zalcitabine. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334(16):1011-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199604183341602. View

3.
Schapiro J, Winters M, Stewart F, Efron B, Norris J, Kozal M . The effect of high-dose saquinavir on viral load and CD4+ T-cell counts in HIV-infected patients. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124(12):1039-50. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-12-199606150-00003. View

4.
de Wolf F, Spijkerman I, Schellekens P, Langendam M, Kuiken C, Bakker M . AIDS prognosis based on HIV-1 RNA, CD4+ T-cell count and function: markers with reciprocal predictive value over time after seroconversion. AIDS. 1997; 11(15):1799-806. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199715000-00003. View

5.
Mitsuyasu R, Skolnik P, Cohen S, Conway B, Gill M, Jensen P . Activity of the soft gelatin formulation of saquinavir in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients. NV15355 Study Team. AIDS. 1998; 12(11):F103-9. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199811000-00001. View