» Articles » PMID: 10436069

Motion Opponency in Visual Cortex

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 1999 Aug 6
PMID 10436069
Citations 73
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Perceptual studies suggest that visual motion perception is mediated by opponent mechanisms that correspond to mutually suppressive populations of neurons sensitive to motions in opposite directions. We tested for a neuronal correlate of motion opponency using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure brain activity in human visual cortex. There was strong motion opponency in a secondary visual cortical area known as the human MT complex (MT+), but there was little evidence of motion opponency in primary visual cortex. To determine whether the level of opponency in human and monkey are comparable, a variant of these experiments was performed using multiunit electrophysiological recording in areas MT and MST of the macaque monkey brain. Although there was substantial variability in the degree of opponency between recording sites, the monkey and human data were qualitatively similar on average. These results provide further evidence that: (1) direction-selective signals underly human MT+ responses, (2) neuronal signals in human MT+ support visual motion perception, (3) human MT+ is homologous to macaque monkey MT and adjacent motion sensitive brain areas, and (4) that fMRI measurements are correlated with average spiking activity.

Citing Articles

Retinotopic coding organizes the interaction between internally and externally oriented brain networks.

Steel A, Angeli P, Silson E, Robertson C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39386717 PMC: 11463438. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.25.615084.


Functional localization of visual motion area FST in humans.

Wen P, Ezzo R, Thompson L, Rosenberg A, Landy M, Rokers B bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345389 PMC: 11430136. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.19.614014.


Humans can use positive and negative spectrotemporal correlations to detect rising and falling pitch.

Vaziri P, McDougle S, Clark D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131316 PMC: 11312537. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.03.606481.


Direct comparison reveals algorithmic similarities in fly and mouse visual motion detection.

Chen J, Gish C, Fransen J, Salazar-Gatzimas E, Clark D, Borghuis B iScience. 2023; 26(10):107928.

PMID: 37810236 PMC: 10550730. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107928.


A key role of orientation in the coding of visual motion direction.

Moon J, Tadin D, Kwon O Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 30(2):564-574.

PMID: 36163608 PMC: 10370529. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02181-2.


References
1.
Newsome W, WURTZ R, Komatsu H . Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. II. Differentiation of retinal from extraretinal inputs. J Neurophysiol. 1988; 60(2):604-20. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.604. View

2.
Qian N, Andersen R . Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology. J Neurosci. 1994; 14(12):7367-80. PMC: 6576905. View

3.
OCraven K, Rosen B, Kwong K, Treisman A, Savoy R . Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT-MST. Neuron. 1997; 18(4):591-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80300-1. View

4.
Zeki S, Watson J, Frackowiak R . Going beyond the information given: the relation of illusory visual motion to brain activity. Proc Biol Sci. 1993; 252(1335):215-22. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0068. View

5.
Zihl J, von Cramon D, Mai N, Schmid C . Disturbance of movement vision after bilateral posterior brain damage. Further evidence and follow up observations. Brain. 1991; 114 ( Pt 5):2235-52. DOI: 10.1093/brain/114.5.2235. View